Chrome Is Fastest in Site-Loading Tests

By Nick Mediati, PC World |  Internet, Chrome, Firefox 2 comments

Last fall, Google claimed that its Chrome 2 Beta browser was "many times faster" than rival browsers at running JavaScript. In February, as it launched the beta of its new browser, Apple asserted that Safari 4 Beta was the world's fastest browser. And this month, Microsoft started marketing Internet Explorer 8 with videos purporting to prove that it's faster than its rivals.

They can't all be right, so PC World undertook detailed real-world tests to determine how quickly each of four browsers--the three mentioned above and Firefox 3.0.7--loaded a series of popular Web sites. The results: Google Chrome 2 Beta beat the field. Its average page load speed for our nine test sites was 1.3 seconds, half a second faster than runner-up IE 8. Safari and Firefox tied for last with an average loading time of 2.12 seconds for each of the test sites. Detailed test results for each browser appear in the accompanying table.

We saw the most significant difference in page load times with the English-language Wikipedia home page and the MySpace home page.
Chrome 2 Beta completed the job of loading Wikipedia in a mere 1.12 seconds, easily outpacing the competition. Internet Explorer 8 chugged to a second-place finish, loading the page in 2.24 seconds on average. Firefox 3.0.7 and Safari 4 Beta lagged behind, however, with average load times of 3.31 seconds and 3.38 seconds, respectively.

Chrome 2 also dusted the competition in loading the MySpace home page, getting it done in an average time of 1.43 seconds. Internet Explorer 8 loaded the page in 2.59 seconds, while Firefox took nearly 3 seconds on average, and Safari well over 4 seconds.

Safari's overall results were disappointing, especially given Apple's claim that Safari is the fastest browser on the market. To its credit, though, Safari did load the Amazon home page faster than any of its three competitors.

Our Speed-Test Methodology

In our browser speed comparison, we pitted a near-final build of Internet Explorer 8 against Firefox 3.0.7 (the current nonbeta version of Mozilla's browser), the beta version of Chrome 2, and the beta of Safari 4. We used a set of nine popular Web sites in our testing: Amazon, MySpace, Yahoo, PC World, YouTube, Microsoft, Apple, eBay, and Wikipedia's English-language home page. To ensure that we measured the page-loading times as accurately as possible, we recorded our testing sessions on video for review later on.

We performed all of our testing on a Gateway P-7811FX notebook running a clean installation of Windows Vista Service Pack 1; we reinstalled the operating system before testing each browser. For each browser, we cleared the browser's cache and then loaded each page in our test suite. We repeated the process ten times per site per browser to ensure accurate results, to factor out fluctuations in network traffic, and to build a sufficiently large sample size to identify trends. In addition, we threw out the two best and the two worst scores for each page load test to further reduce the influence of fluctuations and to produce more consistent results.

Some browsers will report that a page has finished loading even though parts of the page haven't yet appeared. We didn't base our determination of when a page was loaded on the browser's opinion. Instead, we relied on whether all visual elements of the page were loaded and ready to use. For example, on Apple's home page, we judged the page to be ready when all of its graphics and images were loaded, and when the custom search field was ready to use.

Faster, But Should You Care?

The ironic thing about browser makers' speed claims is that many users probably won't notice the difference between the fastest and slowest browsers in our tests. What with fast broadband connections and a bunch of pretty peppy browsers to choose from, few of us spend a lot of time waiting for pages to load. On the other hand, if you're stuck on a slow connection, not even the fastest browser in the world will help you.

Our conclusion: All four of the modern browsers we tested are fast enough that the key factor to consider in determining which one to use shouldn't be "Which one's fastest?" Rather, you should ask "Which one do I like most?" "Which has the features I need?" and "Which one is safest?" That said, it is encouraging to see browser vendors compete with each other, and aim to ship the fastest Web browsers they possibly can.

2 comments

    Anonymous 2 years ago
    Vista's 30 percent market share makes it a poor choice of platform for such a test. With Windows 7 looming, and the most likely next step for XP users who won't be leaving MS for Linux or a Mac, Vista makes little sense here. It's a slow and bloated operating system for which Microsoft has optimized IE8 painstakingly to cover its flaws. Run the same test on XP, and you will see the different results that the real world (most of the people who are proficient enough with computers to care about this sort of thing) sees.Further, what was done in between all those repeated page loads? You say you repeated the process. Does that mean you emptied the cache each time? This is a horrible model of real world use. Many of the speed optimization techniques employed by the various competing browser platforms take advantage of caching, as well as other predictive behaviors to achieve their claimed and/or observed speeds. The correct way to model this is put each browser through an identical journey, from one page, to another, to another, then back to the original, the next, and the next. Speed going back a page is also a critical real world test. I find your results interesting, but entirely meaningless and irrelevant.So what's my own opinion after all that rant? I use Chrome on my PC, Safari on my Mac, and FIrefox on both, when I'm willing to sacrifice speed for features. I find the former two to be more or less equal in perceived speed, trailed by IE6 and finally Firefox. Internet Explorer 7 and 8 have such horrible GUI's, I'm reluctant to include them in discussion, but their vaunted security features are so intrusive that any speed they may wield (dubious at best) is soon wasted. So Chrome still gets a nod from me, but I don't find it any faster than Safari on XP, just a little more pleasurable to use.

      Add a comment

      Post a comment using one of these accounts
      Or join now
      At least 6 characters

      Note: Comment will appear soon after you have activated your account.
      Obscene/spam comments will be removed and accounts suspended.
      The information you submit is subject to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

      ITworld LIVE

      InternetWhite Papers & Webcasts

      White Paper

      Smarter Commerce is redefining value chain visibility

      Smarter Commerce is redefining the value chain in the age of the customer. It starts with putting the customer at the center of your operations - which of itself is not a new idea - however, truly operationalizing this strategy is not easy.

      White Paper

      IBM Synchronizes its Commerce 2.0 Strategy with 'Smarter Commerce' Initiative

      On March 14, IBM announced "Smarter Commerce", a strategic initiative that addresses the surging market for Commerce 2.0 solutions that take advantage of the convergence of a number of disruptive software and hardware technologies.

      See more White Papers | Webcasts

      Ask a question

      Ask a Question