TomTom to pay Microsoft to settle patent cases
GPS navigation device vendor TomTom has agreed to pay Microsoft to settle patent-infringement cases the companies filed against each other in the last five weeks, but Microsoft will not pay fees to TomTom.
TomTom will pay Microsoft to license patents for technologies in its car navigation and file-management system, effectively settling a case Microsoft filed against it last month in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington and with the International Trade Commission, Microsoft said via e-mail from its public relations firm Monday.
However, Microsoft is not paying TomTom to license four patents in Microsoft Streets and Trips, which were at the center of TomTom's case against it the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. That suit, filed earlier this month, was a reaction to Microsoft's.
Specific financial terms of the agreement are not being disclosed.
The result could have ramifications in the open-source community, which was concerned when Microsoft filed its case against TomTom that the vendor is renewing its attack on open source and Linux in particular with patent-infringement claims. The patents at the center of Microsoft's case involved technologies found in a version of the Linux OS that TomTom's portable devices run, and Microsoft has made bold claims that Linux violates more than 235 of its patents.
Microsoft has maintained the suit has nothing to do with Linux but is a disagreement between the two companies over specific technologies. While some open-source proponents tried to keep an open mind, there was worry in the community that the suit seemed a reversal of a friendlier attitude toward open source that Microsoft has tried to cultivate in the last year and a half with donations to open-source projects and the formation of its Platform Strategy Group, which acts as a liaison to the community.
According to the agreement's terms, TomTom will remove within two years from its products functionality related to two file-management system patents that violate Microsoft intellectual property. Customers will be protected during that period from patent infringement claims from Microsoft, the company said.
Three other file-management systems patents TomTom uses in its devices are covered under the suit provided that they are implemented in compliance with the General public License Version 2 (GPLv2), according to Microsoft.
In a statement, Peter Spours, director of IP strategy and transactions at TomTom, said the company's compliance with GPLv2 under the terms of its agreement with Microsoft reaffirms TomTom's commitment to the open-source community.
Horacio Gutierrez, Microsoft's corporate vice president and deputy general counsel of intellectual property and licensing, said in a statement that he is pleased TomTom chose to resolve the matter out of court and that many companies already license the patents in question, including companies that create products containing both open-source and proprietary code.
IDG News Service
Sign up for ITworld's Daily newsletter
Follow ITworld on Twitter @IT_world
On Twitter now
tomtom
Powered by Twitter
jfruh
Apple syncing patent can't come soon enough
pasmith
New Twitter features borrow from 3rd party clients
Esther Schindler
Open Source Changes the Software Acquisition Process
mikelgan
How to set up continuous podcast play on the new iTunes
David Strom
Five important Windows 7 mobility features
sjvn
Guard your Wi-Fi for your own sake
Sandra Henry-Stocker
Grepping on Whole Words
Sidekick: The Good News & the Bad News
Either way you look at it Microsoft Data Center management did not follow standards or best practices in this failure. In which case it makes me wonder more about the outsourcing of corporate data much less personal data.
- mburton325
Join the conversation here
Quick, practical advice for IT pros. Made fresh daily.
Want to cash in on your IT savvy? Send your tip to tips@itworld.com. If we post it, we'll send you a $25 Amazon e-gift card.













Microsoft and
Microsoft and intellectual.....in the same sentence?Baaa haaa haaa haaa...
Maybe Microsoft and stealing, but certainly not MS and intellectual.