P2P bill could regulate browsers, cloud computing
U.S. legislation aimed at curtailing the inadvertent file sharing of personal data on P2P networks could create new regulations for makers of other software, including Web browsers and cloud computing, groups told a congressional subcommittee.
The Informed P2P User Act , introduced in March by Representative Mary Bono Mack, would require that P2P software give users warnings that their files can be shared before installation and each time it's launched.
Although P2P vendors have said they're taking steps to prevent the inadvertent sharing of tax returns, medical records and other personal data, there are still widespread reports about continuing problems, said Bono Mack, a California Republican.
"This hands-off approach has not worked," she said at a Tuesday subcommittee hearing. "Any set of voluntary best practices put forth by the P2P industry can no longer be seen as credible."
In the past two months, Tiversa, a vendor of P2P monitoring services, found more than 3.9 million breaches of personal data, said company CEO Robert Boback. The problem of inadvertent sharing isn't going away, he told the House Energy and Commerce Committee's Subcommittee on Commerce, Trade, and Consumer Protection.
In addition, recent media reports have pointed to plans detailing U.S. President Barack Obama's new helicopter and a military fighter jet project leaked onto P2P networks.
"How many more medical records and tax returns is it going to take for us to act?" Bono Mack said. "How many more state secrets will be made available to those who want to harm us? I believe enough is enough, and the time to act is now."
But Bono Mack's bill defines P2P as software that allows a computer to designate files available for transmission to another computer, to transmit those files and to request that other computers transmit files to it. That definition could include Web browsers, automatic updates and streaming media services, said Robert Holleyman, president and CEO of the Business Software Alliance, a trade group.
"We know that is not the intent of the bill" to force browsers to give file-sharing warnings every time a user launches one, Holleyman said. Some changes to the definition of P2P in the bill could fix the problems with the bill, he said.
Bono Mack questioned why providing notice to consumers would be a problem for legitimate software vendors. "What is the harm?" she asked. "How is notice and consent an issue?"
Sign up for ITworld's Daily newsletter
Follow ITworld on Twitter @IT_world
On Twitter now
file sharing
Powered by Twitter
Esther Schindler
If the comments are ugly, the code is ugly
claird
SVG a graphics format for 21st century
pasmith
Take Chrome OS for a test spin
Sandra Henry-Stocker
Solaris Tip: Have Your Files Changed Since Installation?
jfruh
Android fragments vs. the iPhone monolith
mikelgan
What Gizmodo missed about the Pro WX Wireless USB disk drive
Where Google Chrome security fails: the password
I heard mention that the Chrome OS will have some sort of encryption available a la bitlocker. If it's possible to encrypt personal data using another password or key, then it may have potential for very secure data.... And Ubuntu has an 'encrypt home directory' option, perhaps google should follow suit.
- Dann
Join the conversation here
Quick, practical advice for IT pros. Made fresh daily.
Want to cash in on your IT savvy? Send your tip to tips@itworld.com. If we post it, we'll send you a $25 Amazon e-gift card.













