Unified Communications in the Channel
Unified Messaging holds a great deal of promise in terms of convenience. Imagine being able to click on an icon for a colleague on your computer screen, and then see a range of options for communicating with that individual. Are they in the office? You would automatically ring up their office number. At home? Doesn’t matter, your UM system would ring up their home instead. In the car in between? Ring the mobile. On the beach in Thailand? Well, you might be out of luck there.
Unified Communication (UC), often confused with Unified Messaging, holds similar promise, by integrating real-time applications such as chat, voice calls, and online conferencing, as well as “presence” technology. “Presence” is explained by looking at its most prominent implementation, which is in Instant Messaging—the little message by your icon that tells whether you’re online or not.
It shouldn’t be that hard to create such a system. But the reality is that it can be confusing. Although the underlying technology really isn’t rocket science, getting all the players on the same page is a bit of a puzzle. An article in IT Channel Planet highlighted some new research on the hurdles some companies are facing trying to implement Unified Communication. According to the report, a lot of companies still don’t have a complete grasp of UC, but can benefit from channel players with full package solutions, jockeying for a piece of what will be a $17 billion market by 2011.
Sign up for ITworld's Daily newsletter
Follow ITworld on Twitter @IT_world
On Twitter now
unified messaging
Powered by Twitter
jfruh
Apple syncing patent can't come soon enough
pasmith
New Twitter features borrow from 3rd party clients
Esther Schindler
Open Source Changes the Software Acquisition Process
mikelgan
How to set up continuous podcast play on the new iTunes
David Strom
Five important Windows 7 mobility features
sjvn
Guard your Wi-Fi for your own sake
Sandra Henry-Stocker
Grepping on Whole Words
Sidekick: The Good News & the Bad News
Either way you look at it Microsoft Data Center management did not follow standards or best practices in this failure. In which case it makes me wonder more about the outsourcing of corporate data much less personal data.
- mburton325
Join the conversation here
Quick, practical advice for IT pros. Made fresh daily.
Want to cash in on your IT savvy? Send your tip to tips@itworld.com. If we post it, we'll send you a $25 Amazon e-gift card.












