There's (understandably) been a lot of talk about Windows 7 pricing lately, and yesterday's reveal of a "Family Pack" clause unearthed by blogger Kristan Kenney ramped up the discussion even more. ZD Net's Ed Bott speculates that the family pack will cost $189, while Computerworld speculates a range from $74 to $136.
I'm trying to fit all these numbers together, and to do that I'm going to work with Bott's higher figure. First question, does $189 refer to a Family Pack of full versions, or upgrades? We know that as of now a single full version of Windows 7 Home Premium will sell for $199, so on the face of it that $189 must refer to upgrade versions. At the same time, early adopters can pre-order 3 upgrades for $150. By the time Windows 7 launches that deal will be long gone though, so perhaps the half-price upgrades don't factor into the pricing logic.
I have to wonder how many average consumers are going to upgrade to Windows 7 (if you're reading this post, you probably don't belong in the 'average consumer' category) even at $189 for three upgrades. To the average consumer, 'upgrade' sounds tricky. They wonder if they have to have a Windows Vista CD (most don't, since most bought a PC with Windows pre-installed and no installation media). They aren't sure how the upgrade system works or if they qualify. After all, they don't have a piece of paper that says they own Windows. They decide that it might be safer to just wait until they buy their next PC in a few years.
But what if Microsoft juggled the pricing around a bit? What if they dropped the cost of a full version of Windows 7 Home Premium to $129.00, with a Family Pack of three full version licenses going for Bott's $189.00 figure. The cost of a single-user upgrade drops to $69, so everyone who pre-ordered still has saved some money and can't complain too loudly.
I think consumers would feel a lot more comfortable buying a 'full' license of Windows 7 that doesn't depend on them having to have some other intangible 'thing' that they can't really identify, and these prices make it affordable for a lot more people than the current $199 price. For the vast majority of PC users, the upgrade is totally optional since they already have Windows running in some form. But they've heard the positive buzz about Windows 7, and they think that they should probably get it, for reasons they can't really articulate. Microsoft has to reach out to them in some way, to coax them into taking the plunge. Letting everyone affordably own (finally!) a boxed version of Windows 7 would be a win for both Microsoft and end users.
What do you think? Would a lower price make a difference, or are average consumers just not going to care no matter what? And would Microsoft even consider such low prices? Please leave a comment and let me know what you think.
Sign up for ITworld's Daily newsletter
Follow ITworld on Twitter @IT_world
jfruh
Apple syncing patent can't come soon enough
pasmith
New Twitter features borrow from 3rd party clients
Esther Schindler
Open Source Changes the Software Acquisition Process
mikelgan
How to set up continuous podcast play on the new iTunes
David Strom
Five important Windows 7 mobility features
sjvn
Guard your Wi-Fi for your own sake
Sandra Henry-Stocker
Grepping on Whole Words
Sidekick: The Good News & the Bad News
Either way you look at it Microsoft Data Center management did not follow standards or best practices in this failure. In which case it makes me wonder more about the outsourcing of corporate data much less personal data.
- mburton325
Join the conversation here
Quick, practical advice for IT pros. Made fresh daily.
Want to cash in on your IT savvy? Send your tip to tips@itworld.com. If we post it, we'll send you a $25 Amazon e-gift card.
Windows 7 Flops
Windows 7 will not make it the why should I upgrade from XP?? So I can buy more hardware, not like I have the money right now, and I need some real concrete things that 7 does that XP won't do besides drain my wallet of money...Windows 7
Gene Steinberg of the Tech Night Owl invited me to talk about Microsoft’s Windows 7 and the company’s price-centric ads targeting Mac sales, along with Craig Crossman, from the Computer America radio show, and author and commentator Kirk McElhearn. Listen and subscribe to the dedicated hosting and web design.Windows 7 flops
While leaner and meaner than Vista window 7 has nothing new to offer the average user.. besides the abiity to run XP applications. Not to mention its gaming performance still falls far short of XP. Then theres the problem of the price 100+ bucks for the stripped down basic version and nearly 400 bucks for Ultimate... crap I can buy a Dell desktop with free windows 7 upgrade for 400 bucks. Stop being greedy MS, windows 7 is okay..its not GREAT, 50 bucks for Basic and 100 bucks for Ultimate and you'll go a long way in redeeming yourself for that Vista blunder.