Expert: AT&T botches iPhone 3G S upgrade price concession

AT&T bungled its chance to make amends with angry customers today when it said it will reduce the price of the new iPhone 3G S for some, but not all, current subscribers, a crisis communications expert said Wednesday.

"At first glance, it appeared that AT&T listened to customers, but they seemed to have missed the point," said Dallas Lawrence, vice president of digital media at Washington, D.C.-based Levick Strategic Communications. "Rather than embrace a policy all across its subscriber base, AT&T chose a policy of picking winners and losers, separating the two in some cases by just weeks or pennies spent on monthly bills."

Lawrence was referring to the announcement earlier today by AT&T that it will let more iPhone 3G users buy a new iPhone 3G S at the least expensive prices.

Last Thursday, Lawrence said AT&T had 48 hours or less to change its tune, or risk alienating customers. It missed that deadline by days.

In a letter to customers posted on its Web site, AT&T said it had "listened to our customers" and would price the iPhone 3G S so that customers with last year's iPhone 3G would be eligible for the subsidized prices between June 20 and Sept. 30.

The move was in response to a growing chorus of complaints by customers furious that they would have to pay an extra $200 for an iPhone 3G S if they had not fulfilled most or all of their two-year contract with AT&T. More than 14,500 people, for example, have signed a Twitter petition demanding that AT&T sell them the iPhone 3G S at the same $199 (16GB) and $299 (32GB) prices new customers pay.

Although AT&T's change of heart may have satisfied some of the griping customers, Lawrence thought the telecommunications company stumbled badly. "I'd give them an 'A' for understanding that this was an online crisis, and responding to it in that medium, but I'd give them an 'F' for execution," said Lawrence. "They're going to see that they've only fueled further dissent by people who see themselves as losers in this equation."

Sign up for ITworld's Daily newsletter
Follow ITworld on Twitter @IT_world

• Email
• Print
• Share
  • Slashdot
  • Digg
  • Stumble
  • Reddit
  • Newsvine