Removing robots from your web traffic analysis
When someone first mentioned to me that reports created by running raw access logs through software such as Analog did not meet the needs of high level management, I was caught off guard. "What could possibly be lacking?", I wondered.
If every request for a resource that a web server receives is captured in the access log, what more could anyone want? Besides, Analog annotates the most frequent visitors provides numerous useful graphs depicting such things as the most popular pages, traffic by day of the week, hour of the day, file type, file size and so on. The problem, as it turns out, was not that log files and the reports generated from them contain too little data. On the contrary, they contain too much data.
The top visitors to web sites are often robots, crawlers and spiders -- the programs that run on systems whose job it is to index the contents of the web so that the
rest of us can effectively search it. And those robots can so distort web traffic reports as to make them practically useless. If the top twenty visitors to your site are robots, reports on the top twenty visitors are not likely to tell you
whether your target audience is visiting your site. One way to produce more meaningful web traffic reports is to remove all traffic generated by robots. Fortunately,
well behaved robots will identify themselves by requesting a particular file -- the robots.txt file -- that is generally intended to instruct robots to ignore certain portions of web sites when indexing. A robots.txt, for example, might
look like this:
Disallow: /search Disallow: /groups Disallow: /images Disallow: /catalogs |
Properly behaved robots will request the robots.txt file and then avoid searching through any of the disallowed directories. This means that you can assume that any web client that requests robots.txt is, in fact, a robot.
Here's an example request for robots.txt:
74.6.17.155 - - [01/Apr/2008:00:03:11 +0000] "GET /robots.txt HTTP/1.0" 302 - |
This access log record shows a request occuring just after midnight and a return code (302) that indicates that the requested file has not changed since it was last sent to the particular system.
A reverse lookup of the particular IP address shows us that this request came from a yahoo server, appropriately part of the crawl.yahoo.net subdomain.
# nslookup 74.6.17.155 Server: ns1.anywhere.com Address: 182.8.192.11 Name: llf520181.crawl.yahoo.net Address: 74.6.17.155 |
Sign up for ITworld's Daily newsletter
Follow ITworld on Twitter @IT_world
On Twitter now
robots
Powered by Twitter
jfruh
Apple syncing patent can't come soon enough
pasmith
New Twitter features borrow from 3rd party clients
Esther Schindler
Open Source Changes the Software Acquisition Process
mikelgan
How to set up continuous podcast play on the new iTunes
David Strom
Five important Windows 7 mobility features
sjvn
Guard your Wi-Fi for your own sake
Sandra Henry-Stocker
Grepping on Whole Words
Sidekick: The Good News & the Bad News
Either way you look at it Microsoft Data Center management did not follow standards or best practices in this failure. In which case it makes me wonder more about the outsourcing of corporate data much less personal data.
- mburton325
Join the conversation here
Quick, practical advice for IT pros. Made fresh daily.
Want to cash in on your IT savvy? Send your tip to tips@itworld.com. If we post it, we'll send you a $25 Amazon e-gift card.












