Researcher: Apple antivirus advice 'big to-do about nothing'
Apple recently recommended that Mac users consider running antivirus software -- a move some see as a change of heart by the computer maker, which has poked fun at Windows for being susceptible to attacks.
That's off the mark, one security researcher said Tuesday, as he argued that the attention given the terse Apple support document is much ado about next to nothing.
The chatter started after Apple posted a short notice on its support site on Nov. 21. "Apple encourages the widespread use of multiple antivirus utilities so that virus programmers have more than one application to circumvent, thus making the whole virus writing process more difficult," Apple said in the note before listing three packages from McAfee Inc., Symantec Corp. and Intego , a much smaller security vendor that specializes in Mac software.
Apple's notice was reported by virtually every Mac-centric technology blog, publication and Web site, and was noted by several security companies, including Intego. In a post to the company's blog last Tuesday, Intego said: "It is worth noting this, since Apple, especially in its recent 'Get a Mac' ads, has always publicly tried to ignore the threat of malware to Macs, as well as other security issues. We can only applaud the fact that Apple has chosen to recognize that Macs face security risks and that they require protection."
The "Get a Mac" marketing campaign has included at least two advertisements that drubbed Microsoft Windows for its higher profile among virus writers and identity thieves. In one from 2006, dubbed "Viruses," John Hodgman, the writer and humorist who plays the "PC" character, says, "You'd better stay back...last year there were 114,000 known viruses for PCs" as he stifles a sneeze.
"PCs, not Macs," counters Justin Long, the actor who portrays the "Mac" character.
(The ad can be viewed on Apple's site, or on YouTube.)
Sign up for ITworld's Daily newsletter
Follow ITworld on Twitter @IT_world
On Twitter now
apple
Powered by Twitter
Esther Schindler
If the comments are ugly, the code is ugly
claird
SVG a graphics format for 21st century
pasmith
Take Chrome OS for a test spin
Sandra Henry-Stocker
Solaris Tip: Have Your Files Changed Since Installation?
jfruh
Android fragments vs. the iPhone monolith
mikelgan
What Gizmodo missed about the Pro WX Wireless USB disk drive
Where Google Chrome security fails: the password
I heard mention that the Chrome OS will have some sort of encryption available a la bitlocker. If it's possible to encrypt personal data using another password or key, then it may have potential for very secure data.... And Ubuntu has an 'encrypt home directory' option, perhaps google should follow suit.
- Dann
Join the conversation here
Quick, practical advice for IT pros. Made fresh daily.
Want to cash in on your IT savvy? Send your tip to tips@itworld.com. If we post it, we'll send you a $25 Amazon e-gift card.
And now we see the downside of the move to Intel.
Part of what kept Macs near-virus-free for decades was that they used CPUs (first Motorola 680x0s, later Motorola and IBM PowerPCs) that fewer wannabe hackers knew how to program on the machine-language level. And with their smaller market share, the effort needed to learn a new CPU architecture and machine language was simply not worth it for such hackers.By switching to Intel Cores and Xeons that use the x86 instruction set and architecture, this substantial learning curve has been removed from the equation. A great many more hackers know x86 machine-language programming than know all other CPU architectures and their ML codes combined!
Yes, the move to Intel had its upsides: Motorola and IBM simply weren’t following through with their promises of faster PowerPCs. While Intel had gone through a dark spell of the Pentium 4 (especially the NetBurst architecture version) which was one of the least efficient CPUs ever made by anyone, coming out with the Pentium M (actually a throwback to the Pentium 3 architecture, with the Pentium 4 SSE2 instructions added — in general, a Pentium 4 at a given clock speed would be matched or even beaten by a Pentium M clocked a full gigahertz slower! A 1.4GHz Pentium M roughly matched a 2.4GHz Pentium 4 in actual performance, for instance!) and the Core, Core², and now Core i7 CPUs derived from the Pentium M architecture made all the difference, jumping them well ahead of AMD and even, in many respects, the PowerPC, in terms of actual performance per clock speed.
But Apple should maybe have given more thought to this downside of using a CPU family that nearly every hacker worthy of the name already knew the ins and outs of. Their relative immunity to malware was one of their biggest selling points, and now it’s greatly weakened.
It used to be true that more new malware came out every day for Windows than had ever existed for the Mac (all the way back to and including the LISA)!
My PC is running like new.
My PC is running like new.I was having trouble with my new computer running slow after I had only had it for a few months. I was upset thinking it was something wrong with my computer until I realized that I needed a good scan to clean out those bugs and viruses that was the real problem. When I started using Search-and-destroy Antispyware it took care of this problem and now my PC is running like new again. The antispyware solution from Search-and-destroy, which you can find at http://www.Search-and-destroy.com, has made a big difference for me and I’m sure you’ll be happy with it too.