ComputerWorld just ran a story about how “netbooks disappoint consumers” according to a recent survey. You know why, don't you? People bought netbooks when they really wanted notebooks, and were disappointed when they didn't get the power and performance of a real notebook while spending hundreds of dollars less. Guess what, folks, a chopped steak is not the same as a t-bone steak, and a used Mazda is not the same as a new Mercedes.
The problem here is that people bought a netbook for some reason, such as less money, rather than buying the right tool for their job. Many customers bought netbooks for their small size and easy mobility, even though they never take them anywhere. Heck, if your desktop replacement notebook never goes anywhere, get that 12 pound monster with a 17 inch screen (they have, them, really).
Six of ten buyers surveyed said they didn't understand the difference between a netbook and a notebook. We can blame three parties for this nonsense. First, we can blame the users for not understanding what they were buying. Second, we can blame the netbook vendors for helping confuse the issue. Finally, we can blame notebook vendors for not advertising the differences to ensure customers bought notebooks if they needed notebooks. Of the three, buyers get the most blame. Buyer beware, right?
I'm most surprised by the number of students responding to the survey who were unhappy. I understand they bought netbooks in many cases because they have little money. But since netbooks don't have CD or DVD drives, I figured most students would skip them.
Buying the right tool for the job means you have to understand the job you want the tool to perform. Today, "real" notebooks can be had for less than $500, the cost of high end netbooks. If you just peruse the Web with your mobile computing device, a netbook will work as long as you remember the smaller screen limitations. If you chomp through big spreadsheets or edit audio and video, a netbook is a really bad choice. You're welcome to make that bad choice, and you can even complain on a survey, but none of us will feel sorry for you. Would you expect us to feel sorry for you if you bought a spoon and you really needed a shovel?
Sign up for ITworld's Daily newsletter
Follow ITworld on Twitter @IT_world
Esther Schindler
If the comments are ugly, the code is ugly
claird
SVG a graphics format for 21st century
pasmith
Take Chrome OS for a test spin
Sandra Henry-Stocker
Solaris Tip: Have Your Files Changed Since Installation?
jfruh
Android fragments vs. the iPhone monolith
mikelgan
What Gizmodo missed about the Pro WX Wireless USB disk drive
Where Google Chrome security fails: the password
I heard mention that the Chrome OS will have some sort of encryption available a la bitlocker. If it's possible to encrypt personal data using another password or key, then it may have potential for very secure data.... And Ubuntu has an 'encrypt home directory' option, perhaps google should follow suit.
- Dann
Join the conversation here
Quick, practical advice for IT pros. Made fresh daily.
Want to cash in on your IT savvy? Send your tip to tips@itworld.com. If we post it, we'll send you a $25 Amazon e-gift card.
Netbooks
I think when netbooks come with Windows 7 they'll start to become a replacement to notebooks. And if best buy's accidental leak of prices is correct, then this won't be too expensive an upgrade. The RC runs like a dream on netbooks and aeros even runs. Also with nvidia designing new chipsets to go inside of netbooks to give them at most 1gb of video memory to give them a lot more power. And with portable slimline DVDROMS and DVD-RW's retailing for practically nothing, I think most people would purchase one if they knew they needed one.Take some time to think through your needs . . .
It's all about choice, given one's particular needs. The good news is that the alternatives are ever expanding. That's why 'PC' is short for 'Personal Computer.Consumers need to be wise enough to take some time, determine what they want their purchase to do for them and to what extent the personal computers they are considering accomplish those ends.
For my needs, the little Acer Aspire One netbook is fantastic, especially for the price. It can be easily adapted as a fully functional, full blown stationary computer, using a legacy monitor, keyboard and mouse. Plus, it's small size satisfies my portability preferences far better than my prior 15" laptop.
Carefully deciding what one's requirements are for their computing device is likely to produce a satisfied buyer.
Yeah
I think this is a firm case of caveat emptor. Every store I've seen selling netbooks prominently has the system specs listed by the machine. They also have sales associates standing by who have firmly announced that consumers may want to consider a notebook instead of a netbook because of performance (and I'm guessing a bit more of a profit margin). I mean really, can anyone else be blamed if a student KNOWS they need to use cd's, only to discover that their netbook doesn't have a cd drive? In this day and age there is no excuse to not know what a cd is, or what is required to use it. Making poor decisions shouldn't be blamed on anyone but the buyer.