Channel

And now, Symantec gets it all right

6 comments | 23I like it!
July 29, 2008, 08:58 AM — 

We all know that customer service is key. I’ve beaten up on many companies over the years when, in my view, service levels dropped below the threshold of acceptability or when someone’s language skills descended into the depths of incomprehensibility. Of late, Dell has been one my targets.

That’s why it’s so refreshing to regale a vendor with kudos for customer service performed expertly. The beneficiary of my admiration today is Symantec.

After receiving a copy of Norton 360 from Symantec’s public-relations agency, I decided to install it on the PCs in my home office, a place where I spend far too much time. First, I uninstalled every last shred of the McAfee software that had caused horrible problems for nearly 18 months. To finish the removal, I delved into the registry and removed every last entry containing the word McAfee.

Next, I installed Norton 360. Smooth sailing. But then problems appeared. The annoying Norton bar in my browser continually noted that my machine was unprotected. It suggested that I click the “fix” button to immediately, well, fix the problem. Alas, clicking the button did nothing. I clicked again and again. I clicked harder and harder. Nothing.

That’s when I shot off an online help request to Symantec’s 24 x 7 support team. Within seconds, a window popped up with Rajesh ready to conduct a live chat and solve the problem. I can read English perfectly, so this was a whole lot better than a phone conversation.

Rajesh asked for permission to take over control of my PC. I downloaded and installed an Active-X control that gave him the power. Now, I sat back and watched as he reproduced the problem and checked registry entries. After 15 minutes he informed me that he would need to completely uninstall and reinstall the software. That process included a couple of reboots, which, thanks to the Active-X control, re-established the session with him each time.

An hour later, everything was running perfectly. And it still is. Curiously, system performance is now a lot perkier.

I’m impressed by how Symantec handled the situation and how it was resolved quickly and expertly — on the first try. I’ve had other customer support situations where, after two years, I’m still waiting for the vendor to get back to me. That network hardware vendor’s name I’ll not reveal.

And that brings me to your customer support structure. Do phone calls get answered quickly? Are e-mail messages responded to? Is there follow through to guarantee the problem was solved to the customer’s satisfaction? Do you ask the customer to rate the experience? Woe unto you if any one of these is not done, for it’s much more expensive to find a new customer than it is to keep a current one.

We could all learn a little from Symantec.

Sign up for ITworld's Daily newsletter
Follow ITworld on Twitter @IT_world

I like it!
Comments

It's great to see a company

It's great to see a company pay attention to its customers like Symantec does. I have a very similar experience as yours with Symantec (ironically, after I called Dell and they could not get it right. I just called Symantec instead and they fixed it super quickly!).
| reply

Hi Joel, This is Vijay, I'm

Hi Joel,

This is Vijay, I'm a Supervisor with Symantec Chat Support. I have planned to appreciate the technician who had assisted you. But, I was not able to trace your chat session. I'd appreciate if you could me with the details of the chat session you had? Any details like, the E-mail ID with which you had contacted us, chat Id that was provide to you, date in which you had contacted us.

This should help me a lot.

Thanks,
Vijay
| reply

Concluding that Symantec's

Concluding that Symantec's tech support operation "gets it right"
as an extrapolation from one incident where the solution was a
reinstall of the software makes for a pretty weak article.

First, uninstalling and reinstalling a package is usually the first
recommendation by any software support representative. For the
inexerienced, having an analyst remotely connect to your PC and
perform the steps may seem pretty cool, but Dell and other tech
support organizations have been doing that for years.

Second, the comment posted by the Supervisor with Symantec Chat
Support, 'Vijay', hints at a major problem behind the scenes at
Symantec's tech support system. They either don't have or don't
use a comprehensive issue tracking system. I also suspect that
the names used in the chat sessions are anonymizing screen names,
not true identifiers.

My experience with Norton Antivirus tech support over the last
week convinced me of that even before I read this article.

After updating from NAV 2007 to NAV 2008, when I got tired of
ignoring prompts from NAV2007 to do so, I opened a chat session
with Symantec support. NAV 2008 didn't recognize my valid
License Key and LiveUpdate ran for hours while dominating my
CPU (95% CPU usage for up to 7.5 hrs).

I was told to run the Norton Removal Tool and then reinstall
NAV 2008. I did so, and this corrected the License Key issue,
but not the LiveUpdate problem.

I initiated another chat session, giving the case no. from the
first one, and after remotely connecting to my PC, the analyst
asked me to wait while the issue was passed to someone more
experienced. I waited an hour and a half, then closed the
chat window and resumed my life.

Despite the fact that I provided an e-mail address and phone
number before opening the chat session, I've never been
contacted to follow-up that lapse.

The next day I opened another chat session and the analyst
asked me to stay online for a transfer to a Case Manager, after
I described the situation. Another analyst took over quickly
and after remotely connecting to my PC, spent 5 hrs trying to
diagnose and correct my LiveUpdate problem. However, after
the 3rd or 4th reboot, the connection tool indicated that its
registration key had expired and I was left with no way to
reconnect with that analyst. Apparently the analyst also had
no way to reconnect with me, despite the e-mail address and
phone number I provided when initiating the chat session.

I opened another chat session and asked to be reconnected to
the analyst I'd been working with, but I was told that this
analyst couldn't "find the records' of my previous chats.
I allowed this analyst to remotely connect to my PC. I told
the analyst that LiveUpdate (the problem) wasn't currently
running, but if we started it the remote connection would be
heavily impacted. The analyst looked around, mentioned that
NAV 2008 displayed a green check mark indicating all was okay,
and then went on to try to convince me that resource usage
by LiveUpdate was entirely normal. His supervisor apparently
agreed with him. I opened a window on my desktop with the
transcript from a previous chat, but this analyst seemed to
not be interested in reading it (the scroll bar didn't move).
I told the analyst he was wasting my time and I terminated
the remote session and the chat session.

I've since contacted Symantec via e-mail, described my tech
support experience to date and asked for 2nd or 3rd tier
support, but thus far I'm unimpressed by the response. I'm
about to go looking for a replacement for my Antivirus.
| reply
peer-to-peer

Esther Schindler
If the comments are ugly, the code is ugly

claird
SVG a graphics format for 21st century

pasmith
Take Chrome OS for a test spin

Sandra Henry-Stocker
Solaris Tip: Have Your Files Changed Since Installation?

sjvn
64-bits of protection?

jfruh
Android fragments vs. the iPhone monolith

mikelgan
What Gizmodo missed about the Pro WX Wireless USB disk drive

 

Where Google Chrome security fails: the password
I heard mention that the Chrome OS will have some sort of encryption available a la bitlocker. If it's possible to encrypt personal data using another password or key, then it may have potential for very secure data.... And Ubuntu has an 'encrypt home directory' option, perhaps google should follow suit.
- Dann

Join the conversation here

The Daily Tip

The Daily TipQuick, practical advice for IT pros. Made fresh daily.

Hot tips:

Want to cash in on your IT savvy? Send your tip to tips@itworld.com. If we post it, we'll send you a $25 Amazon e-gift card.

Newsletters

Subscribe to ITWORLD TODAY and receive the latest IT news and analysis.

I would like to receive offers via email from ITworld partners.
By clicking submit you agree to the terms and conditions outlined in ITworld's privacy policy.
Featured Sponsor

AISO founders envisioned a Web hosting company that was environmentally friendly. While the company employed energy-efficient innovations like solar panels, its infrastructure produced unacceptable power and cooling requirements. Find out how AISO leveraged AMD technology to overcome their challenge in this case study white paper.

In this whitepaper, Scalar explores the opportunity to change the landscape with respect to mission critical databases built around Oracle. Leveraging technologies such as Linux, high-end commodity processing power and Oracle RAC technology to architect, design, build and maintain database infrastructure that delivers maximum availability, reliability and performance at a fraction of traditional cost.

On a typical day, weather.com, the Web site for The Weather Channel in Atlanta, serves up between 15 million and 20 million page views. But in September 2004, when back-to-back hurricanes ransacked Florida, the peak traffic on one day more than tripled: over 70 million page views by more than 7 million unique visitors. Read the full success story now.

Marketplace