<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itworld.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Endpoint security</title>
 <link>http://www.itworld.com/taxonomy/term/27/all</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>xx</language>
<item>
 <title>Five reasons Google Chrome OS Security Wins</title>
 <link>http://www.itworld.com/security/85913/five-reasons-google-chrome-os-security-wins</link>
 <description>Chrome OS&#039; reliance on a password is a major security problem, but in other ways it has great security. Here&#039;s why.
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itworld.com/security/85913/five-reasons-google-chrome-os-security-wins#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/endpoint-security">Endpoint security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/internet">Internet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/network-access-control">Network access control</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/networking">Networking</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/open-source">Open Source</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/operating-systems">Operating systems</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/security">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/software">Software</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/analysis-0">Analysis</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/chrome-os-2">Chrome OS</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/desktop-linux">desktop linux</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/google">Google</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/linux">Linux</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:33:59 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>sjvn</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">85913 at http://www.itworld.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Where Google Chrome security fails: the password</title>
 <link>http://www.itworld.com/security/85698/where-google-chrome-security-fails-password</link>
 <description>Google promises that Chrome will be a much more secure  than Windows. Well, yes, but it also has one big problem as well.
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itworld.com/security/85698/where-google-chrome-security-fails-password#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/endpoint-security">Endpoint security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/internet">Internet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/network-access-control">Network access control</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/networking">Networking</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/open-source">Open Source</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/operating-systems">Operating systems</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/security">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/opinion">Opinion</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/google-chrome-os-8">Google. Chrome OS</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/password">password</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/security-0">security</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:42:06 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>sjvn</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">85698 at http://www.itworld.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>64-bits of protection?</title>
 <link>http://www.itworld.com/security/85303/64-bits-protection</link>
 <description>Microsoft claims that the 64-bit version of Windows 7 is actually safer than ordinary Windows 7. They actually have a point. Sort of. 
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itworld.com/security/85303/64-bits-protection#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/endpoint-security">Endpoint security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/operating-systems">Operating systems</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/security">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/windows">Windows</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/opinion">Opinion</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/64-bit">64-bit</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/security-0">security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/windows-7">Windows 7</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 22:48:52 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>sjvn</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">85303 at http://www.itworld.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Poisoned Google search</title>
 <link>http://www.itworld.com/security/85108/poisoned-google-search</link>
 <description>Even simple Google search results can lead you into malware, so never ever go on the Web without anti-virus protection.
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itworld.com/security/85108/poisoned-google-search#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/endpoint-security">Endpoint security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/internet">Internet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/security">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/windows">Windows</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/opinion">Opinion</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/coppermine">Coppermine</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/google">Google</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/malware">malware</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/taxonomy/term/178">search</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 19:08:11 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>sjvn</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">85108 at http://www.itworld.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Crashing Windows 7 &amp; Server 2008 R2 with SMB</title>
 <link>http://www.itworld.com/security/84556/crashing-windows-7-server-2008-r2-smb</link>
 <description>Something seems off with Microsoft&#039;s networking quality assurance in Windows 7 and Server 2008 R2. Yet another SMB bug has shown-up.
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itworld.com/security/84556/crashing-windows-7-server-2008-r2-smb#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/endpoint-security">Endpoint security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/networking">Networking</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/security">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/data-center">Server and data center</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/software">Software</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/windows">Windows</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/opinion">Opinion</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/smb">SMB</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/windows-7">Windows 7</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/windows-server-2008-r2">Windows Server 2008 R2</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:03:47 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>sjvn</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">84556 at http://www.itworld.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Avoiding the Windows Fonts of Doom</title>
 <link>http://www.itworld.com/security/84415/avoiding-windows-fonts-doom</link>
 <description>Another day, another Windows security hole patched, but don&#039;t delay putting the latest patch in for Web font problems or you may be in for a world of hurt.
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itworld.com/security/84415/avoiding-windows-fonts-doom#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/endpoint-security">Endpoint security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/internet">Internet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/security">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/software">Software</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/windows">Windows</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/best-practice">Best practice</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/font">font</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/internet-explorer">Internet Explorer</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/patch">patch</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/windows-0">Windows</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:59:33 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>sjvn</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">84415 at http://www.itworld.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Child Porn: Malware&#039;s ultimate evil</title>
 <link>http://www.itworld.com/security/84077/child-porn-malwares-ultimate-evil</link>
 <description>If malware starts storing child pornography on your PC, your life is likely to be ruined forever. Don&#039;t let it happen to you.
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itworld.com/security/84077/child-porn-malwares-ultimate-evil#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/endpoint-security">Endpoint security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/internet">Internet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/security">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/tech-society">Tech &amp;amp; society</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/opinion">Opinion</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/child-porn">child porn</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/file-sharing-0">file-sharing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/firewall">firewall</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/malware">malware</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/peer-peer-0">peer-to-peer</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 13:24:33 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>sjvn</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">84077 at http://www.itworld.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>An important Linux fix</title>
 <link>http://www.itworld.com/security/83917/an-important-linux-fix</link>
 <description>It&#039;s not often that Linux needs to be fixed, but a recently discovered security problem does deserve your attention.
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itworld.com/security/83917/an-important-linux-fix#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/endpoint-security">Endpoint security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/networking">Networking</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/open-source">Open Source</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/operating-systems">Operating systems</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/security">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/software">Software</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/analysis-0">Analysis</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/kernel">kernel</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/linux">Linux</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/novell">Novell</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/null">null</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/red-hat">Red Hat</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 14:43:15 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>sjvn</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">83917 at http://www.itworld.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Guard your Wi-Fi for your own sake</title>
 <link>http://www.itworld.com/security/83535/guard-your-wi-fi-your-own-sake</link>
 <description>I used to run my Wi-Fi Access Points in open mode. No more. It&#039;s not safe. Here&#039;s why.
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itworld.com/security/83535/guard-your-wi-fi-your-own-sake#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/endpoint-security">Endpoint security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/hardware">Hardware</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/internet">Internet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/mobile-wireless">Mobile &amp;amp; wireless</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/networking">Networking</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/security">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/opinion">Opinion</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/access-point">Access Point</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/ddos">DDOS</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/network-slowdown">network slowdown</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/syn">SYN</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/wi-fi">wi-fi</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 11:23:19 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>sjvn</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">83535 at http://www.itworld.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Patch and Patch Again</title>
 <link>http://www.itworld.com/security/83406/patch-and-patch-again</link>
 <description>Microsoft is always patching Windows. What some people don&#039;t know is that they often don&#039;t get it right the second time either.
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itworld.com/security/83406/patch-and-patch-again#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/endpoint-security">Endpoint security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/operating-systems">Operating systems</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/security">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/windows">Windows</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/opinion">Opinion</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/linux">Linux</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/office">office</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itworld.com/patch">patch</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 15:20:57 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>sjvn</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">83406 at http://www.itworld.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
