Social networking has become widely adopted in the consumer and personal market place, but has not gotten the anticipated traction in the business world. I've been mulling over this market dilemma for a long time and have developed some ideas to explain the lagging business adoption. For clarity, social networking is defined as the bundling of all of the components of communication: wikis, blogs, podcasts, video, content development tools (document and presentation development, and spreadsheet functionality), instant messaging and email. I'd be interested in getting your feedback on these ideas, as well as your thoughts on why we are seeing such a slow adoption of social networking within the business community.
The value in the consumer arena is clear. There are literally hundreds of groups representing a wide variety of interests. These networks are essentially communities of interest. This week I saw a press release for a social network in the consumer market on the topic of shoes. Shoes are a serious topic for some shoppers, and I immediately saw the appeal of the network. Who doesn't want to know the latest trends in shoes being shown a year in advance at the fashion shows of Paris and Milan? To get a jump on the trend affords buyers the opportunity to look for more affordable knockoffs or comparables even before the new models arrive. The point here, consumer-based social networks tend to be very narrowly focused on a specific topic.
The value of personal social networks is also obvious. By now I am sure you have signed up for Plaxo or LinkedIn or possibly both. Each of these personal networks also provides subdivisions to more narrowly focused networks such as MIT Alumni or Business Intelligence. Individuals obtain value through their professional relationships. Personal networks are not materially different than the old fashioned rolodex, it just puts the information in an electronic location. Where we once picked up the phone to speak with our business contacts, we now send emails or even group emails. The value of personal social networking has not changed, it has just gone electronic.
Sign up for ITworld's Daily newsletter
Follow ITworld on Twitter @IT_world
jfruh
Apple syncing patent can't come soon enough
pasmith
New Twitter features borrow from 3rd party clients
Esther Schindler
Open Source Changes the Software Acquisition Process
mikelgan
How to set up continuous podcast play on the new iTunes
David Strom
Five important Windows 7 mobility features
sjvn
Guard your Wi-Fi for your own sake
Sandra Henry-Stocker
Grepping on Whole Words
Sidekick: The Good News & the Bad News
Either way you look at it Microsoft Data Center management did not follow standards or best practices in this failure. In which case it makes me wonder more about the outsourcing of corporate data much less personal data.
- mburton325
Join the conversation here
Quick, practical advice for IT pros. Made fresh daily.
Want to cash in on your IT savvy? Send your tip to tips@itworld.com. If we post it, we'll send you a $25 Amazon e-gift card.
Business Social Networks are growing fast
Business social networks are growing fast they just don't get the publicity, nor do they reach the readership of Facebook or YouTube.I suggest you have a look at companies like Xeequa.com that specialize in supporting business social networking. In the past few months they have helped companies launch over 100 networks and are launching a new one every 6 hours. That's just one platform.
John Todor, Ph.D.
Author of Get with it! Practical Ways to Use Web 2.0 in Your Business.
Your expertise
You might want to stick to subjects that you know something about, Martha. You're way off base here.I appreciate the criticism
I appreciate the criticism and your time in providing it. Tell me how you see the adoption of enterprise social networking differently. I'm interested in your perspective.I see social networking as being highly complementary to business process virtualization. Send me your phone number and I'll give you a call. I'm interested in hearing more on your perspective.