Timeline claims victory in SQL Server case

By Ashlee Vance, IDG News Service |  Development Add a new comment

A Washington court has issued a judgement against Microsoft Corp. in a case that could prove costly for certain customers and partners who use its SQL Server database, according to software vendor Timeline Inc., which opposed Microsoft in the case.

In a judgement issued Friday, the Washington Superior Court of King County confirmed that a 1999 licensing agreement between the two companies limits Microsoft's ability to "sublicense" patented technology that was developed by Timeline and employed by Microsoft in SQL Server, Timeline said in a statement Wednesday.

The judgement means that certain customers, independent software vendors and other parties who have customized SQL Server by adding programs to it will have to pay Timeline a licensing fee for the use of its technology, according to Charlie Osenbaugh, chief executive officer at Timeline, in Bellevue, Washington.

Microsoft played down any impact the ruling may have, but wasn't prepared Wednesday to comment on the court's decision in detail. "It's important to note that Timeline has a history throughout this case of presenting issues to create uncertainty among our customers," said Microsoft spokesman Jim Desler, adding that its unclear yet what Microsoft's next legal move will be.

The dispute goes back to about 1999, when Microsoft asked the Washington court to affirm that under the terms of its licensing agreement with Timeline, Microsoft's customers and partners are entitled to sublicense Timeline's patented technology at no charge to develop their own applications.

Timeline offered the court a different interpretation of the license. It argued at the time that the agreement "clearly distinguishes between users of Microsoft products who may employ Timeline technology, and certain third party software developers to whom Microsoft may not sublicense."

The technology in question relates to the design and use of data marts and data warehouses and is protected by three U.S. patents, according to Timeline.

Last week's judgement confirms that Microsoft's right to sublicense Timeline's technology is "substantially limited," and means that some SQL Server users may be liable to pay Timeline for use of its technology, according to Timeline's Osenbaugh. The company didn't offer a clear estimate of how many users may be affected, saying only that it believes that "some" are.

Timeline said a license to its technology ranges from US$250,000 to $5 million depending on the size of the licensee and how the technology is used.

    Add a comment

    Post a comment using one of these accounts
    Or join now
    At least 6 characters

    Note: Comment will appear soon after you have activated your account.
    Obscene/spam comments will be removed and accounts suspended.
    The information you submit is subject to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

    ITworld LIVE

    DevelopmentWhite Papers & Webcasts

    White Paper

    HP NonStop SQL Fundamentals whitepaper

    This whitepaper offers a detailed look into the fundamentals of HP NonStop SQL solutions. See how this system delivers unprecedented levels of application availability with fail-safe data integrity and meets the needs of enterprises with large-scale business critical applications.

    White Paper

    Nebraska Medical Center case study

    See how the Nebraska Medical Center implemented a SQL solution to make information more readily available to streamline operations, improve patient care and facilitate medical research with an enterprise solution running on HP NonStop servers.

    White Paper

    Concepts of NonStop SQL/MX

    For DBAs and developers who are familiar with Oracle solutions and want to learn about NonStop SQL/MX, this whitepaper provides an overview of the similarities and differences between the two products-with a specific focus on implementation.

    White Paper

    6 Things Your CIO Needs to Know About Requirements

    If your organization is not predictably successful on technology projects, there is likely an issue in requirements. CIOs must take action and own requirements maturity improvement. There are 6 main things a CIO must know about requirements.

    Webcast On Demand

    User Experience Monitoring

    In this webinar, you will learn hints & tips for improving end-user response times from Forrester Research analyst, Jean-Pierre Garbani.

    Sponsor: Nimsoft

    See more White Papers | Webcasts

    Ask a question

    Ask a Question