Governments wrestle the spam dilemma
Government officials and industry associations today met at the House of Commons to discuss possible solutions to the ever-expanding problem of unsolicited e-mail.
The EU directive to fight spam, which becomes law in the UK in October, enforces an opt-in scheme so that commercial email can only be sent where the recipient has expressly agreed to receive that mail.
But the problem lies in enforcement. Firstly, EU law is only binding on European countries, so most of the areas from where spam originates - South East Asia and South America - are beyond the reach of the directive. Secondly, even within the EU there are no real rules on controlling and monitoring the opt-in clause, as implementation and enforcement are down to each member state.
"The recipient will have to have given permission, but we will not be checking where the sender acquired the recipients address from in the first place or how permission was granted," admitted Philip Gerrard, spokesman for the EU's Information Society.
Exact figures on how much of the world's internet traffic is junk mail are varied - generally pinpointed at between 30 to 70 percent - but all bodies recognise that this problem is getting worse. Antivirus firm Brightmail Inc. says spam now accounts for 48 percent of all messages across its networks, with adult content making up 19 percent of spam.
"When we developed email facilities we didn't predict that spam would be such a problem and therefore didn't build in solutions to prevent users sending anonymous emails," said Enrique Salem, spokesman at Brightmail. "What we need to do now is create transparency. If we know where these mails are coming from then we can block them."
Our current PC Advisor poll revealed that nearly a quarter (23.4 percent) of all emails received by readers are spam, while a third said that nearly all of their emails are junk, proving the ever-growing problem of unsolicited bulk email.
Spam filtering group Spamhaus estimates that 90 percent of the world's spam mail is generated by 200 identified servers, most of which are based in China and South America. It believes that by making their activities illegal, spammers will be forced further underground making it harder for them to operate.
"We don't want to legitimise spam and create rules like the US is doing, we want to make it illegal," said Spamhaus' Steven Linford.
But it is clear that legislation alone is not enough. Government officials and industry associations today met at the House of Commons to discuss possible solutions to the ever-expanding problem of unsolicited email.
The EU directive to fight spam, which becomes law in the UK in October, enforces an opt-in scheme so that commercial email can only be sent where the recipient has expressly agreed to receive that mail.
Sign up for ITworld's Daily newsletter
Follow ITworld on Twitter @IT_world
jfruh
Apple syncing patent can't come soon enough
pasmith
New Twitter features borrow from 3rd party clients
Esther Schindler
Open Source Changes the Software Acquisition Process
mikelgan
How to set up continuous podcast play on the new iTunes
David Strom
Five important Windows 7 mobility features
sjvn
Guard your Wi-Fi for your own sake
Sandra Henry-Stocker
Grepping on Whole Words
Sidekick: The Good News & the Bad News
Either way you look at it Microsoft Data Center management did not follow standards or best practices in this failure. In which case it makes me wonder more about the outsourcing of corporate data much less personal data.
- mburton325
Join the conversation here
Quick, practical advice for IT pros. Made fresh daily.
Want to cash in on your IT savvy? Send your tip to tips@itworld.com. If we post it, we'll send you a $25 Amazon e-gift card.













