SCO unveils Linux licensing scheme
One day after being sued by Linux vendor Red Hat Inc. for "unfair and deceptive actions" relating to its claims about intellectual property violations in the Linux source code, The SCO Group Inc. Tuesday will tell Unix users exactly what it would cost to bring their systems out of the sights of SCO's lawyers.
SCO's charge: US$699 per processor.
SCO claims that the Linux source code contains unauthorized contributions, and in March it sued IBM Corp. for $1 billion, claiming that Big Blue had made some of those additions in violation of its Unix licensing agreement with SCO. Since then, the Lindon, Utah, company has widened the scope of its claims. It is now seeking more than $3 billion in damages from IBM, and maintains that Linux users themselves could be subject to lawsuits for illegally using SCO's intellectual property.
Tuesday's announcement presents users with the option of paying SCO rather than running the risk of litigation. The $699 per processor fee applies to server licenses only, said SCO spokesman Blake Stowell. His company also plans to offer less expensive licensing options for desktop and embedded Linux users, he said.
The license, called the SCO Intellectual Property License for Linux, lets Linux users run SCO's intellectual property in binary form only. "It gives you a license to run the software only. You can't view the source, and you can't contribute it to an open-source product for everyone's use," Stowell said.
Open-source advocates have said that such a license would violate Linux's GNU General Public License, (GPL) which prohibits the Linux source code from being mixed with a license like SCO's, but Stowell disagreed. "This is a license that is designed to run in addition to the GPL," he said.
SCO's price tag is too high, according to one industry analyst. "That seems pretty steep to me," said Sageza Group Inc. analyst Charles King, referring to the $700 ballpark figure that SCO had previously mentioned. "If they made this thing so cheap and so easy that it made more sense to pony up a few thousand bucks and pay it, and not think about it anymore, they might actually generate some interest in it."
By pricing its Linux license fee in the same range as its UnixWare license, SCO may prompt Linux users to demand that it first prove its allegations, King said. "The enterprises that are deeply invested in Linux are going to pull out their slide rule and say, 'OK, prove it'."
For those users, SCO is offering an additional incentive. A single processor server license will jump to $1,399 after Oct. 15, Stowell said.
IDG News Service
Sign up for ITworld's Daily newsletter
Follow ITworld on Twitter @IT_world
Brian Proffitt
Microsoft/Novell: Breaking Down the Coupon Numbers
Esther Schindler
Drupal's Dries Buytaert on Building the Next Drupal
Tom Henderson
Top Ten General Operating Systems Rants
pasmith
PS3 motion controller delayed; goes up against Project Natal
sjvn
Neolithic Windows security hole alive and well in Windows 7
claird
Perl source code comparison makes for good reading
mikelgan
Cell phones don't create stress or interrupt much
Sandra Henry-Stocker
How to: The Unix Interview
Where Google Chrome security fails: the password
I heard mention that the Chrome OS will have some sort of encryption available a la bitlocker. If it's possible to encrypt personal data using another password or key, then it may have potential for very secure data.... And Ubuntu has an 'encrypt home directory' option, perhaps google should follow suit.
- Dann
Join the conversation here
Quick, practical advice for IT pros. Made fresh daily.
- Ubuntu advances: Why Ubuntu server installations will surge in 2010
- Social media marketing: How to make friends with benefits
- More...
Want to cash in on your IT savvy? Send your tip to tips@itworld.com. If we post it, we'll send you a $25 Amazon e-gift card.






