SCO's proof bogus, Linux advocate says
The first publicly released sample that The SCO Group Inc. claims was improperly added to the Linux source code has every right to be in Linux, according to open-source advocate Bruce Perens.
SCO executives released the 15-line code snippet during a keynote at the company's annual user conference, SCO Forum, in Las Vegas Monday, claiming that the code had been inappropriately copied, line by line, into Linux. The slide showing the code was photographed and published by a reporter for the German publisher, Heise, and then analyzed by Perens.
The code in question was copyrighted by AT&T Corp. whose Unix rights were later transferred to SCO, but also released under the BSD (Berkeley Software Distribution) license, which would allow it to be included in Linux, Perens said. It represents an algorithm that can be used to manage a computer's memory, he said.
The Linux source code has been at the center of a US$3 billion legal dispute between SCO and IBM Corp., which SCO accuses of inappropriately contributing code to the open-source operating system. SCO launched a lawsuit against IBM in March, and Big Blue countersued in August, charging SCO with patent violations, breach of contract and breach of the GNU General Public License.
SCO itself released the code to the open-source community in 2002, when it distributed its 16-bit "Ancient Unix" code under an open-source license, he claimed.
"First of all, it's not a trade secret. Second, it's copyrighted, but used under license in Linux," he said.
SCO spokesman Blake Stowell had not viewed Perens' analysis, but he reasserted his company's belief that the code was inappropriately contributed. "At this point it's going to be his word against ours," he said of Perens.
The creator of Linux said he is not surprised by Perens' analysis. "It sure as hell looks like it's BSD-licensed and has been around forever," Linus Torvalds said in an e-mail interview. "This was what we claimed was the likely source of any common code in the first place: BSD code and various vendor stuff."
Perens' code analysis illustrates how important it is for SCO to make its claims public, Torvalds said. "If there is anything really suspicious, I want to remove it ASAP. But I'm absolutely not surprised at all when it turns out that it isn't suspicious."
Perens' analysis can be found at: http://perens.com/Articles/SCOCopiedCode.html
IDG News Service
Sign up for ITworld's Daily newsletter
Follow ITworld on Twitter @IT_world
Esther Schindler
If the comments are ugly, the code is ugly
claird
SVG a graphics format for 21st century
pasmith
Take Chrome OS for a test spin
Sandra Henry-Stocker
Solaris Tip: Have Your Files Changed Since Installation?
jfruh
Android fragments vs. the iPhone monolith
mikelgan
What Gizmodo missed about the Pro WX Wireless USB disk drive
Sidekick: The Good News & the Bad News
Either way you look at it Microsoft Data Center management did not follow standards or best practices in this failure. In which case it makes me wonder more about the outsourcing of corporate data much less personal data.
- mburton325
Join the conversation here
Quick, practical advice for IT pros. Made fresh daily.
Want to cash in on your IT savvy? Send your tip to tips@itworld.com. If we post it, we'll send you a $25 Amazon e-gift card.













