Users report SP2 breaks their applications
That Windows XP's latest update, SP2, will break some applications, is unquestioned even by Microsoft Corp. It even held back the service pack's release when it realized that one of its own applications would be affected.
But it's early days for SP2, which adds features, mostly concerning security, as well as fixes to the now-ageing OS. At this stage, finding sysadmins who have installed the released version of the service pack is not easy. That applies in spades if you're looking for anyone who has deployed it for real in a production environment of any size. And it's hardly surprising given the size and complexity of the update.
Because of the extensive changes that Service Pack 2 includes, the software giant has urged developers and IT professionals to test the update thoroughly. However, "it just seems that Microsoft doesn't quite understand how difficult this is to do," said Bill Lewkowski, CIO at Metropolitan Health, a company with 1,300 users recently migrated to Windows XP with SP1. "We can't do unplanned, unbudgeted service pack releases that are very similar to putting in a whole new version of an operating system," said Lewkowski. "I'm frustrated with Microsoft."
Randy Truax, a technical services manager at Metropolitan Health said: "I almost prefer just fixes, because if they start putting in new functionality that developers have to test their code against, it adds a lot of complexity for us." IBM has also instructed its users not to install it.
What can be gleaned though from those who have reported on their experiences to date is that the biggest concern centers around the new security features - hardly surprising since this is the main impetus behind the service pack.
Among the most obvious changes is the built-in firewall. Now on by default, it's likely to break applications if they use unusual IP ports to access applications, whether personal or corporate. In addition, the firewall is designed to activate much earlier in the boot cycle than before and remains on until after the IP stack is disabled, which may cause problems for users whose machines need to access network resources.
Tests suggest that there are some unusual and as yet unexplained features in SP2. For example, one test center reportedly installed SP2 and found it caused BSDs (blue screens of death). Using Microsoft's own suggested procedure to roll back to a pre-installation environment, they found that it also uninstalled SP1, and "uninstalled every device that existed in the PC. Network cards, video cards and all system resources were uninstalled."
Sign up for ITworld's Daily newsletter
Follow ITworld on Twitter @IT_world
Brian Proffitt
Microsoft/Novell: Breaking Down the Coupon Numbers
Esther Schindler
Drupal's Dries Buytaert on Building the Next Drupal
Tom Henderson
Top Ten General Operating Systems Rants
pasmith
PS3 motion controller delayed; goes up against Project Natal
sjvn
Neolithic Windows security hole alive and well in Windows 7
claird
Perl source code comparison makes for good reading
James Gaskin
Learn How To Print Pages In Order with Ink Jet Printers
mikelgan
Cell phones don't create stress or interrupt much
Sandra Henry-Stocker
How to: The Unix Interview
Where Google Chrome security fails: the password
I heard mention that the Chrome OS will have some sort of encryption available a la bitlocker. If it's possible to encrypt personal data using another password or key, then it may have potential for very secure data.... And Ubuntu has an 'encrypt home directory' option, perhaps google should follow suit.
- Dann
Join the conversation here
Quick, practical advice for IT pros. Made fresh daily.
- Ubuntu advances: Why Ubuntu server installations will surge in 2010
- Social media marketing: How to make friends with benefits
- More...
Want to cash in on your IT savvy? Send your tip to tips@itworld.com. If we post it, we'll send you a $25 Amazon e-gift card.






