September 20, 2004, 12:06 PM — With the U.S. Congress winding down its work for 2004, technology lobbying groups are stepping up their push for lawmakers to pass several pieces of legislation, including extensions to a research and development (R&D) tax credit and an Internet access tax moratorium.
Many tech groups have pushed for a permanent R&D tax credit, but separate bills passed by both the House of Representatives and Senate only extend the credit for 18 months. The R&D tax credit is one small piece of the huge corporate tax bills passed by the chambers, but significant differences exist between the two pieces of legislation, and a compromise isn't likely to be ironed out in conference committee before Congress adjourns for its election recess around Oct. 1.
Congress may return for a lame-duck session after the November election.
Tech groups also have asked Congress for a permanent ban on taxes unique to the Internet, but a Senate version of the Internet tax moratorium, passed in April, would only extend the moratorium for four years. House legislation, passed in September 2003, would permanently ban Internet access taxes and other taxes unique to the Internet, but a group of senators questioned whether the ban would limit states and local governments from levying taxes on telecommunications services as telecom companies move their traffic to IP (Internet Protocol).
The moratorium expired last November, and if Congress fails to act, state legislatures may begin to look at taxing Internet access, said Joe Tasker, senior vice president and general counsel at the Information Technology Association of America (ITAA). "If Congress doesn't get it done in conference, it sends a signal to states," he added. "It's important for the Internet."
While supporters of the tax moratorium say access and other Internet taxes would slow the grow of the Internet in the U.S., a group of senators, lead by Tennessee Republican Lamar Alexander, have said a broad ban on Internet taxes, including voice over IP service, could cost states billions of dollars in tax revenues.
The House version of the moratorium would have "permanently taken away state and local authority to include high-speed Internet access in its taxation plans and would have put at risk literally billions of dollars in revenues that states, cities and towns now depend on to pay for police, schools, parks and other local services," Alexander said, in a speech on the Senate floor earlier this month.
Alexander urged the House to adopt the Senate temporary moratorium, and he questioned whether taxing the Internet would hurt its growth as much as some proponents of a permanent tax ban have suggested. Broadband adoption has outpaced the adoption of cell phones, color television and CD players, he noted.
"There were dire predictions that if states were allowed to keep taxing this access that it would become a terrible burden for the industry, restrict its growth and put the United States in some technological backwater," Alexander said. "Nothing could be further from the truth.
"Almost every day in my mailbox comes a new offer from someone to sell me high-speed Internet access," he added. "Electric companies are selling high-speed Internet access. Next thing you know, I expect the milkman to show up offering to provide me with high-speed Internet access."
The ITAA included both the R&D tax credit and the Internet tax moratorium on its list of congressional "must do" items released this month.
In the past year, the ITAA also has fought proposals to limit so-called offshore outsourcing in about 40 state legislatures, Tasker noted. "Dealing with that issue in 40 states is an enormous undertaking," he added. "It's extremely important that we don't deal with Internet taxation, too."
The corporate tax bills awaiting conference committee compromises also have items that could affect offshore outsourcing, or global hiring. Both the House bill, called the American Jobs Creation Act, and the Senate bill, called the Jumpstart Our Business Strength (JOBS) Act, include incentives for U.S. companies to reinvest their foreign earnings back in the U.S. The two bills differ in their approach, but both would temporarily reduce the tax on foreign income brought back into the U.S. from the typical 35 percent to 5.25 percent.
Republicans argue the provision would potentially pump billions of dollars back into the U.S. economy, while some Democrats, led by Representative Charles Rangel of New York, questioned whether the bill sends a message to companies that the U.S. government supports offshore outsourcing. "I believe this bill may create more jobs, but they will not be American jobs," Rangel said in June.
