India blocks Web sites, blogs after terrorist attacks
The Indian government has blocked about 20 Web sites and blogs in India, following suspicions by the country's intelligence agencies that the sites were likely being used by terrorists to communicate with each other.
ISPs (Internet service providers) received instructions over the weekend from the government's Department of Telecommunications (DOT) to block about 20 URLs (uniform resource locators), said Deepak Maheshwari, secretary of the ISP Association of India in Delhi. The orders did not indicate why the URLs were being blocked, he said.
The move to block the sites may be related to the bomb blasts in trains in Mumbai earlier this month, which killed about 190 people and injured around 700. Government sources were not immediately available for comment.
A group of bloggers, called the BloggersCollective (http://groups.google.com/group/BloggersCollective), has been formed to monitor the block on the Web sites and blogs, and to influence opinion against the move by the Indian government.
Under India's Information Technology Act of 2000, Web sites can be blocked if they are found to be promoting hate, violence, terrorism or pornography.
Although the instructions from the DOT list specific pages and Web sites, several ISPs have blocked some blogs altogether because they were not equipped to filter specific pages, Maheshwari said.
The Indian government set up the Indian Computer Emergency Response Team (CERT-IND) in 2003 with the authority to block Web sites. On receiving instructions from CERT-IND, DOT, which has regulatory control over the ISPs, has to ensure that the Web sites are blocked, and inform CERT-IND accordingly.
Although some Indian bloggers insist on their right to continue to blog without hindrance, there is a strong section of opinion even among bloggers that it may be necessary to block some sites if it will help foil terrorist attacks. A post on The Great Indian Mutiny (http://mutiny.wordpress.com/2006/07/17/blog-blackout/) asked for more maturity from users, arguing that the issue was not one of freedom of speech, but only a temporary security measure.
IDG News Service
Sign up for ITworld's Daily newsletter
Follow ITworld on Twitter @IT_world
jfruh
Apple syncing patent can't come soon enough
pasmith
New Twitter features borrow from 3rd party clients
Esther Schindler
Open Source Changes the Software Acquisition Process
mikelgan
How to set up continuous podcast play on the new iTunes
David Strom
Five important Windows 7 mobility features
sjvn
Guard your Wi-Fi for your own sake
Sandra Henry-Stocker
Grepping on Whole Words
Sidekick: The Good News & the Bad News
Either way you look at it Microsoft Data Center management did not follow standards or best practices in this failure. In which case it makes me wonder more about the outsourcing of corporate data much less personal data.
- mburton325
Join the conversation here
Quick, practical advice for IT pros. Made fresh daily.
Want to cash in on your IT savvy? Send your tip to tips@itworld.com. If we post it, we'll send you a $25 Amazon e-gift card.
