Oracle says Apex tool won't suffer predecessor's fate

August 30, 2006, 11:30 AM —  IDG News Service — 

As Oracle Corp. officially unwrapped release 2.2 of its free Web application development tool now known as Application Express (Apex), the vendor stressed its commitment to the software's future.

Oracle wants to contrast Apex and Web DB, an earlier development tool along similar lines to Apex, which the vendor effectively drove to an early grave by ceasing to enhance it.

Apex, which became generally available Tuesday, was previously called HTML DB. The tool makes it easier for Oracle users with limited programming experience to build, deploy and manage secure Web applications with information contained in Oracle databases. The name change gives a better idea of what the tool does, according to Mike Hichwa, vice president of software development at Oracle.

HTML DB began life in February 2004 when version 1.5 debuted. Apex 2.2 marks the fourth release of the software, Hichwa said. He was deeply involved in the design of both Web DB and Apex.

"Oracle never killed Web DB; they never enhanced it," Hichwa said. "We created a new product, Apex. There was a broken lineage, it was dropped, then picked up again. I apologize to users. We don't plan on doing that again."

Scott Spendolini believes Oracle is committed to Apex. He quit the vendor's tools division to set up three-person IT consultancy Sumner Technologies LLC, in Vienna, Virginia, which has based its business on Apex.

"Web DB was a good first try," Spendolini said. "They had the opportunity to do it again and take the lessons they'd learned." Apex is more secure than Web DB and allows users to build applications, not just components that they then have to glue together by writing a lot of code, he added.

The main new feature in Apex 2.2 is the ability to package up all the tables, statements, style sheets and artwork needed to run an Apex application into a single file. That capability should make it easier for users to install such applications since they'll only need to access one file and are helped through the installation process by software wizards.

Oracle developed Apex in-house with the exception of the JavaScript Editor, which it outsourced to Dutch company Q42, Hichwa said. Oracle owns all the Apex code.

Looking ahead to Apex 3.0, planned for summer 2007, Oracle is working on a tool to automate migration from applications based on Microsoft Corp.'s Access database to Apex. There will also be increased Ajax support throughout the tool.

"It's a chicken-and-egg situation," Hichwa said. "If you go out too leading-edge on Ajax, you lessen the number of browsers that can support" your software, so Oracle looks to strike a balance between strong Ajax support and what browsers Apex can support.

Hichwa has spent over 18 years at Oracle. Back in the late 1980s when he joined the company, Oracle prided itself as being a leader in offering customers strong development tools that were well integrated with its databases. "I think we're kind of going back to that now," Hichwa said, pointing to Apex and SQL Developer, Oracle's first visual database development tool, which appeared in March.

Oracle is now putting "a tremendous amount of resources and effort" into its tools, he added, including work in usability labs tracking users' eye and mouse movements as they try out its software.

» posted by jnaze

IDG News Service

Sign up for ITworld's Daily newsletter
Follow ITworld on Twitter @IT_world

I like it!
Post a comment
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
peer-to-peer

Esther Schindler
If the comments are ugly, the code is ugly

claird
SVG a graphics format for 21st century

pasmith
Take Chrome OS for a test spin

Sandra Henry-Stocker
Solaris Tip: Have Your Files Changed Since Installation?

sjvn
64-bits of protection?

jfruh
Android fragments vs. the iPhone monolith

mikelgan
What Gizmodo missed about the Pro WX Wireless USB disk drive

 

Sidekick: The Good News & the Bad News
Either way you look at it Microsoft Data Center management did not follow standards or best practices in this failure. In which case it makes me wonder more about the outsourcing of corporate data much less personal data.
- mburton325

Join the conversation here

The Daily Tip

The Daily TipQuick, practical advice for IT pros. Made fresh daily.

Hot tips:

Want to cash in on your IT savvy? Send your tip to tips@itworld.com. If we post it, we'll send you a $25 Amazon e-gift card.

Newsletters

Subscribe to ITWORLD TODAY and receive the latest IT news and analysis.

I would like to receive offers via email from ITworld partners.
By clicking submit you agree to the terms and conditions outlined in ITworld's privacy policy.
Featured Sponsor

AISO founders envisioned a Web hosting company that was environmentally friendly. While the company employed energy-efficient innovations like solar panels, its infrastructure produced unacceptable power and cooling requirements. Find out how AISO leveraged AMD technology to overcome their challenge in this case study white paper.

In this whitepaper, Scalar explores the opportunity to change the landscape with respect to mission critical databases built around Oracle. Leveraging technologies such as Linux, high-end commodity processing power and Oracle RAC technology to architect, design, build and maintain database infrastructure that delivers maximum availability, reliability and performance at a fraction of traditional cost.

On a typical day, weather.com, the Web site for The Weather Channel in Atlanta, serves up between 15 million and 20 million page views. But in September 2004, when back-to-back hurricanes ransacked Florida, the peak traffic on one day more than tripled: over 70 million page views by more than 7 million unique visitors. Read the full success story now.

Marketplace