April 06, 2007, 8:37 AM — Qualcomm Inc. is using its Web site for the latest shove against Nokia Corp. in the companies' ongoing legal dispute.
A document on Qualcomm's site presents what the company calls contradictory statements that Nokia has made regarding technology licensing. Qualcomm sent an e-mail message on Wednesday to direct reporters to the document, which is on the news part of its Web site.
Qualcomm and Nokia are embroiled in a dispute over patent licensing that may come to a head on Monday, when longstanding arrangements between the companies are set to expire. Nokia currently licenses cellular technologies from Qualcomm, which pioneered CDMA (Code-Division Multiple Access) mobile communications. Qualcomm licenses out patented technologies involved in a number of cellular systems. There are several lawsuits ongoing between the two companies.
The document, entitled "Nokia's Public Position as a Licensee vs. Nokia's Position as a Licensor," lines up statements from Nokia and observers concerning a suit filed against Qualcomm in Delaware last year next to comments taken from a Nokia suit against Spanish phone vendor Vitelcom in 2004. The Delaware suit is about Nokia licensing technology from Qualcomm, whereas the Vitelcom case involved the Spanish company using Nokia's technology.
The comments in the document on Qualcomm's site involve the sometimes thorny issue of licensing technology that is included in industry standards, which vendors need to use in order to meet those standards. In such cases, companies are generally required to license the technology on a "fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory" (FRAND) basis.
Qualcomm implies that Nokia has taken different positions depending whether it controls the technology or is licensing it in a particular case. For example, the document quotes Nokia as saying in the Delaware suit that if a company commits to FRAND terms, it can't seek an injunction against a user of the technology. On the other hand, Nokia sought an injunction against Vitelcom in just such a situation.
Qualcomm hadn't pointed out the supposed contradictions before because it only recently had access to the information in such a way that it could be used publicly, said Mike Hartogs, senior vice president and division counsel for Qualcomm's licensing business. Hartogs wouldn't comment on whether Qualcomm would use the statements in court.
"We've taken the position in court and in public that the view Nokia has been espousing is contradicted ... by its own actions in the past," Hartogs said.