Megaupload founder a 'flight risk', prosecutor says

Kim Dotcom remanded in custody, Judge reserves his decision.

By Siobhan Keogh, PC World New Zealand |  Networking, copyright, Megaupload

Left to right, Mathias Ortmann, Fin Batato and Bram Van der Kolk, and Kim Dotcom, appear in court January 20.

IDG News Service

Megaupload founder Kim Dotcom has been remanded in custody following a bail hearing. The judge presiding over the hearing, Judge David McNaughton, reserved his decision and hoped to make a written decision tomorrow.

Earlier in the day, the Crown argued on behalf of the US government that Megaupload founder Kim Dotcom is considered a significant flight risk.

Crown prosecutor Anne Toohey said that Dotcom was a risk because of his numerous aliases - his name varies on his travel documents - as well as his access to funds, and because he allegedly evaded arrest by hiding in a safe room in his mansion.

"Dotcom poses a flight risk at the extreme end of the scale," Toohey said.

Dotcom's lawyer Paul Davison said Dotcom, who was very security conscious, had not been trying to evade arrest by hiding in his panic room, as he had not known the people pounding on his bedroom door were police.

Once he realised they were police, "he was frightened so he stayed there", Davison said.

An unmodified pistol-grip shotgun was present in the panic room, which was illegal as no one in the house had the appropriate firearms license. It was loaded with a rubber bullet and there was "absolutely no suggestion" that Dotcom was going to use it, Davison said.

Crown lawyer Toohey also argued that Dotcom was a flight risk because he had once fled from charges in Germany.

However, Davison said Dotcom had been unaware of charges against him on leaving Germany, and had returned on hearing of them.

Toohey said he also posed a risk of reoffending as there was financial incentive to do so, and because there are numerous domains registered by Megaupload that could be used.

However Davison argued that Dotcom had no intentions of restarting Megaupload.

"He has no interest in reinstating the business until this is sorted," Davison said.

Davison said Dotcom and Megaupload had spent millions of dollars on legal advice to ensure the company was operating within the law.

181 copyright holders were capable of directly removing content from Megaupload, he said.

Users were also required to agree to a Terms of Service agreement barring them from uploading copyrighted material.

Police visited Dotcom's home to discuss security before raid


Originally published on PC World New Zealand |  Click here to read the original story.
Join us:
Facebook

Twitter

Pinterest

Tumblr

LinkedIn

Google+

Answers - Powered by ITworld

ITworld Answers helps you solve problems and share expertise. Ask a question or take a crack at answering the new questions below.

Join us:
Facebook

Twitter

Pinterest

Tumblr

LinkedIn

Google+

Ask a Question
randomness