MIT experts clash in Microsoft case

By Patrick Thibodeau, Computerworld |  Operating Systems

Franklin Fisher, the MIT economics professor who testified yesterday in the
Microsoft Corp. antitrust case, spent much of his time on the witness stand refuting
the work of a fellow MIT colleague and Microsoft expert witness, Richard Schmalensee.

Before court recessed for the day, Fisher appeared to have hit every element of
Schmalensee's earlier testimony -- his economic analysis, judgment and data --
characterizing them in parts as "muddled," mixed up," "confused" and even "ridiculous."

David Boies, the lead government attorney, said after Tuesday's court session that
Fisher's attack on Richard Schmalensee, dean of MIT's Sloan School of Management,
was "gentle."

However, it was hard to imagine how Fisher could have built a more sweeping attack.

In the late afternoon session, Fisher attacked the statistical data that Schmalensee
used to build his thesis.

Schmalensee's browser market-share analysis was built on survey data that didn't
measure what people actually do but what they say they can do, Fisher said. And the
answers people give to these kinds of surveys can be "quite confused," he said.

Peculliar survey results

One survey result, which Fisher termed "very peculiar," asked people who used
Windows 98 where they got their browsers. Less than 20% of the sample answered that
they got their browser with the computer, despite the fact that Internet Explorer comes
with Windows 98.

Fisher also questioned whether Schmalensee was gullible in his dealings with
Microsoft. In his testimony, Schmalensee has said a certain economic calculation was
impossible because of Microsoft's practice of recording sales on paper. Fisher said
that Schmalensee "with his usual good nature, was rather credulous."

Fisher will return to the witness stand today for more questions from Boies.
Microsoft's cross-examination is expected to begin this morning as well.

Schmalensee will get his chance to defend himself as a rebuttal witness for
Microsoft.

On the issue of America Online Inc.'s purchase of Netscape Communications Corp.,
Fisher argued late yesterday that it was unlikely that AOL wouldn't adopt Netscape's
browser. AOL now uses Internet Explorer technology for its interface.

Microsoft believes the Netscape browser could become an operating system threat if
independent software developers began developing applications to run off it. But Fisher
believes that Netscape's market share has been damaged beyond repair. "I think it's too
late," he said.

Fisher, questioned by Boies, said that many of the problems in Schmalensee's
analysis stem from his decision not to define operating systems as a separate market.
Instead, operating systems in Schmalensee's analysis were included as part of the
software market generally. "That's not relevant," Fisher said.

Join us:
Facebook

Twitter

Pinterest

Tumblr

LinkedIn

Google+

Operating SystemsWhite Papers & Webcasts

See more White Papers | Webcasts

Answers - Powered by ITworld

ITworld Answers helps you solve problems and share expertise. Ask a question or take a crack at answering the new questions below.

Join us:
Facebook

Twitter

Pinterest

Tumblr

LinkedIn

Google+

Ask a Question
randomness