When start-ups merge

By Jim Champy, Computer World |  Business Add a new comment

Big merger-and-acquisition deals inevitably get attention. Anyone who glances at headlines is familiar with their names: AOL and Time Warner, General Electric and Honeywell, Exxon and Mobil. The whole phenomenon resembles the mating of elephants. To most of us, the participants seem just a little too outsized for reality. Still, they're real.

Economies and efficiencies of scale are what many such deals are based on. Only one corporate staff and headquarters is required. Lots of duplication can be eliminated. That appears to be the motivation that cemented the GE/Honeywell deal.

Observing the mating of smaller companies, especially those that have IT at their core, also offers some interesting lessons. Because there isn't as much fur flying around, there may be more to see.

Many technology start-ups -- including the dot-coms -- have found that it takes a lot longer to reach profitability than they anticipated. These companies' ability to spend cash is astounding -- often millions of dollars per month. And now, money is coming more slowly from capital markets. Many technology start-ups have no option other than to sell or merge.

Increasingly, technology-based start-ups will eye one another. After all, their cultures are often similar: entrepreneurial, hard-driving and passionate. If these companies can come together, good ideas will be saved and new opportunities created. For established companies, this means technology choices will increase and stronger potential business partners will be created.

But merging smaller companies can be challenging. The first rule for success is that the two companies and their people must like each other. That means they must have similar or complementary cultures, an advantage that smaller start-ups often enjoy. It's the only way for two companies to work well together.

But putting two struggling start-ups together also requires a precise approach. Just hoping for the best won't work. Careful scrutiny must be focused on customers; on potentially differing points of view, especially about markets; and on technology itself.

At all costs, the customer base must be preserved. Most start-ups have usually expended a large portion of their resources on whatever customers they have. That's certainly true of most dot-coms. For some, in fact, customers are their biggest asset. Other than its flashy image, the failed Boo.com, just acquired by Fashionmall.com, had mostly customers to offer.

Another rule of a successful merger is to pay as much -- if not more -- attention to taking care of customers as to internal battles, which often deal with such sensitive issues as who stays and who goes or whose name survives.

Watch for fundamentally different views that may not show up during the first waltz. For instance, start-ups may have very different presumptions about adoption rates of their respective products or services. There may also be very different views about how to market and sell. Also, be sure to get early agreement on the underlying assumptions of a joint strategy.

Finally, avoid the fierce religious wars that often arise over competing technologies. If two companies with different technology platforms (like SAP and Oracle) come together, apply rational analysis and decision-making. If two companies that have built their own technology platforms come together, the battle can worsen. No one wants to give up a personal investment of work and energy.

The truth is that one technology will usually outperform the other; it will offer a better platform on which to get to market faster, require less of an investment or cost less to maintain.

Making the right decisions about which technology to use is critical to success, especially if expenditures are at issue.

Most small technology companies have great ideas. They just may not have the capital or the business form to make them work. But if companies follow these rules, a merger may offer a second chance.

Underestimating Acquisitions

In a survey of 125 companies worldwide that have completed acquisitions in the past two years, PricewaterhouseCoopers found that three out of four reported problems with integrating IT, which caused delays and missed opportunities. Nearly 80% said that if they had moved faster on their IT integration, it would have gone smoother, according to the New York-based consulting company's online publication, re: Business.

"Typically, companies underestimate the amount of effort required to integrate systems," says Kurt Frers, national leader of transactions services at PricewaterhouseCoopers in Toronto.

Also, for the first time in the three years the survey has been conducted, acquiring management and technical talent was one of the top five reasons for approving an acquisition -- 47% this year vs. 33% last year.

    Add a comment

    Post a comment using one of these accounts
    Or join now
    At least 6 characters

    Note: Comment will appear soon after you have activated your account.
    Obscene/spam comments will be removed and accounts suspended.
    The information you submit is subject to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

    ITworld LIVE

    BusinessWhite Papers & Webcasts

    White Paper

    Insiders Can Ruin Your Company. Take Action.

    Did you know that 80 percent of threats to an organization come from the inside? The threat from insiders is often overlooked in organizations worldwide. This white paper from NetIQ, discusses key technology solutions that help to prevent and detect insider threats.

    White Paper

    Ten Steps to an Enterprise Mobility Strategy

    Enterprise employees are more mobile, relishing the ability to work productively anywhere, at any time. They may use any means to get connected, often creating financial and security risks for your company. Discover how to get control of your enterprise mobility strategy and ensure mobile worker productivity with these ten steps.

    White Paper

    What You Need to Know About the Costs of Mobility

    Mobile workers want to get connected anywhere, at any time, often at any cost. Enterprise mobility is often a hidden "black" budget in your company. Ensure that your traveling employees are productive everywhere, even while you control cost and security, through an enterprise mobility strategy.

    White Paper

    The 2011 iPass Mobile Enterprise Report

    This industry survey covers trends, recommendations and a policy guide on managing Enterprise Mobility for IT management and CIOs. Get data on employee device liability, as well as smartphone/tablet penetration, budget control and provisioning. Find out how your organization compares, how to ensure mobile worker productivity, and control costs.

    White Paper

    Smarter Commerce is redefining value chain visibility

    Smarter Commerce is redefining the value chain in the age of the customer. It starts with putting the customer at the center of your operations - which of itself is not a new idea - however, truly operationalizing this strategy is not easy.

    See more White Papers | Webcasts

    Ask a question

    Ask a Question