Texans face off over UCITA bill

By Patrick Thibodeau, Computerworld |  Government

A Texas-size wrangle over the proposed Uniform Computer Information Transactions Act -- one that pits large corporate users against a group of major technology vendors -- is under way in the Lone Star State. It could become a key showdown for the controversial legislation to regulate software licensing contracts.
The legislation, known informally as UCITA, was approved relatively easily last year in two states: Virginia and Maryland. But things are different in Texas, where opponents are moving aggressively to prevent the state legislature from passing the measure.

The opposition has "definitely caught on," said Val Perkins, an attorney and lobbyist for the Texas Business Law Foundation. The foundation pushed for the recent introduction of UCITA in the Texas House of Representatives and Senate. "Long before the bill was filed, members in both houses had already received a barrage of e-mails and letters expressing opposition," Perkins said.

Because of the opposition, passage of UCITA is seen as unlikely in Texas this year. And if the measure isn't approved by the time the Texas Legislature adjourns in May, it won't be taken up again until the state's lawmakers -- who meet only every two years -- return for their next session in January 2003.

"We're certainly going to press the bill to try to get it through," said Celeste May, general counsel to state Sen. John Corona, a Republican who is sponsoring the bill. "But because of the amount of opposition out there, we're not really hopeful that this will happen."

A number of large companies, including The Boeing Co. in Seattle and Phillips Petroleum Co. in Bartlesville, Okla., are leading the attack against UCITA in Texas and other states that are considering the proposed law. They're up against vendors such as Compaq Computer Corp. and Microsoft Corp. and technology industry trade groups that back the measure.

Among the reasons Phillips opposes the proposal, which was written by the Chicago-based National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws (NCCUSL), are provisions that could allow vendors to remotely shut off software at user sites in the event of contract disputes, said Ken Rigsbee, director of government relations at the $21.2 billion petroleum refiner and distributor.

Nationwide Insurance Cos. in Columbus, Ohio, recently estimated that UCITA could up its internal costs by a minimum of $20 million annually due in part to security problems associated with the "self-help" remote disabling provision, as it's referred to in the measure. The insurer also cited the likelihood of increased contracting and negotiation costs if UCITA is widely adopted.

Join us:
Facebook

Twitter

Pinterest

Tumblr

LinkedIn

Google+

Answers - Powered by ITworld

ITworld Answers helps you solve problems and share expertise. Ask a question or take a crack at answering the new questions below.

Ask a Question