July 16, 2001, 2:17 PM — Microsoft Corp. last week approached a top official at the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) with a proposal to launch a new round of settlement talks, according to an article in Monday's Wall Street Journal.
A Microsoft spokesman said the company "would not comment on anything related to potential settlement efforts." A DOJ spokesperson could not be reached for comment.
According to the article, Microsoft telephoned Charles James, the Justice Department's recently appointed assistant attorney general for the antitrust division, shortly before it announced plans on Wednesday to loosen restrictions on hardware manufacturers regarding the Windows desktop. The software company said it will no longer require PC makers to preserve the Internet Explorer icon on the desktops of Windows-based PCs that they ship to customers, and it will allow them to show the icons of third-party software applications.
Microsoft had acknowledged that it changed its policy in reaction to a recent Appeals Court ruling that found such action to be part of the company's monopoly maintenance practices.
In terms of resolving the antitrust case that the government has brought against Microsoft, each side currently has three options: to settle; to take the case to the U.S. Supreme Court; or to follow the Appeals Court order that the case be returned to the District Court where a new judge would consider what remedy to impose on Microsoft. The Appeals Court in June upheld the District Court's ruling that Microsoft illegally used monopoly power to maintain dominance of the desktop operating system market, but it overturned the order to break the company in two.
In addition to the DOJ, which led the antitrust lawsuit in trial, Microsoft has to contend with the 18 states and the District of Columbia, which joined the DOJ as plaintiffs. New Mexico last Thursday settled its antitrust claims against Microsoft Corp., the first of 19 state attorneys general to withdraw from the legal battle since last year's District Court ruling that Microsoft broke antitrust laws. Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal said Monday that he would not comment on any potential settlement negotiations.
Some observers see settlement emerging as the likely course of action. That scenario is supported by Microsoft's reported contact with James last week, and by the Justice Department's statement on Friday that it does not intent to bring the case before the Supreme Court.
"I think (settling) is a very reasonable thing for Microsoft to do -- to try and control their own destiny and not simply put their fate in the hands of the District Court," said Mark Schechter, partner at law firm Howrey Simon Arnold & White LLP in Washington, D.C.