HP, Compaq merger doesn't mesh
Stung with the news that Hewlett-Packard Co. (HP) is acquiring Compaq Computer Corp., some analysts are just beginning to form a tentative view of the merger, saying that the advantages of the deal are not completely clear and that the companies are somewhat mismatched.
HP's announcement that it plans to buy Compaq in a $25 billion stock purchase took many industry watchers by surprise, given the similarities between the hardware titans.
"I don't think that this is great news," said Roger Kay, an analyst with International Data Corp. (IDC). "They both have similar profiles to begin with."
Kay said that it is difficult to see where there is synergy between the two companies, despite HP's strength in the printer market, and possible geographical advantages of melding the companies' operations.
Brian Gammage, a principal analyst at Dataquest Inc., a unit of Gartner Inc., agreed.
"This is a defensive move by two struggling management teams who are looking to find a position in the computer industry," Gammage said. "They are putting together two companies that aren't complementary to protect their falling margins and to reinforce their existing market presence."
Kay concurred. "It would make more sense for IBM and Dell to combine," he said, noting Dell Computer Corp.'s efficiency and IBM Corp.'s worldwide presence.
"Picking out of the four major companies (Dell, Compaq, IBM and HP), this is the least complementary pairing," said Gammage, who said that he believed the merger was a product of Dell's price war.
However, Larry Hawes, a senior analyst at Delphi Group Inc., said that despite the companies' similarities, he believed that they do complement one another.
Hawes noted that Compaq's 1998 purchase of Digital Equipment Corp. gave the company some great technology, but commented that the company hasn't had the sales and organization to leverage it. However, Hawes believes HP's expertise can help in this area.
"In some ways, there is an opportunity for them to benefit (from the merger)," Hawes said.
But although saying that the combined company could seize some opportunities in time, the analyst still approached the deal with caution.
"There's no doubt a lot of issues need to be worked out," he said. "Sometimes one plus one just equals two and not two and a half or three," Hawes added, illustrating that the combined company will not necessarily be better than the separate entities.
Tony Iams, an analyst at technology researcher D.H. Brown and Associates Inc. did some different math in terms of the technology resulting from the merger, however.
"I see two pluses, two minuses and a wash," Iams said.
The pluses, according to Iams, begin with Compaq's experience with the Intel platform and the company's ability to support the technology from PCs to back-end servers.
Sign up for ITworld's Daily newsletter
Follow ITworld on Twitter @IT_world
Esther Schindler
If the comments are ugly, the code is ugly
claird
SVG a graphics format for 21st century
pasmith
Take Chrome OS for a test spin
Sandra Henry-Stocker
Solaris Tip: Have Your Files Changed Since Installation?
jfruh
Android fragments vs. the iPhone monolith
mikelgan
What Gizmodo missed about the Pro WX Wireless USB disk drive
Sidekick: The Good News & the Bad News
Either way you look at it Microsoft Data Center management did not follow standards or best practices in this failure. In which case it makes me wonder more about the outsourcing of corporate data much less personal data.
- mburton325
Join the conversation here
Quick, practical advice for IT pros. Made fresh daily.
Want to cash in on your IT savvy? Send your tip to tips@itworld.com. If we post it, we'll send you a $25 Amazon e-gift card.













