Instant messaging protocol hits speed bump

By Stephanie Sanborn, InfoWorld |  Software

THE IETF (INTERNET Engineering Task Force) this week put its instant messaging (IM) standard on the back burner, choosing to overhaul and revamp the protocol through a conglomeration of proposals submitted by various IM companies before June 15.

Although the IETF had been working on IMPP (Instant Messaging and Presence Protocol) since last year, the proposed protocol was tangled up in details and "abstractions," which necessitated a change, said IMPP working group co-chair Dave Marvit with Fujitsu Laboratories America.

"It turns out, the more you think about IM and try to get a really good standard that's both secure and scalable and easy to write to and all that good stuff, it's hard," explained Marvit, adding that the group has been "banging around discussing the issues kind of in abstract" until realizing about two months ago that writing a protocol of this scope could not be done correctly by a committee.

"For a while, they weren't taking any more drafts and I think they were getting into the weeds a little too much - it got to a level where maybe not as much was getting accomplished as could be," said Brian Park, senior producer for YahooMessenger. "Now that they know what a lot of the issues are, this new proposal will take existing issues into account- I think this is a good step in the right direction."

Marvit said the IETF will be collecting standards proposals from IM companies and creating a subset or one large proposal from parts of each submission in hopes of finding a proposal a majority of companies can agree on.

"We're not abandoning anything; we're saying let's put the working group on hold. We will not use that as the process for this next step," Marvit added. "When we get those protocol proposals, if they all stink, we'll say 'OK, back to the drawing board.' If they're good, if some are good and some aren't, we'll ditch the ones that aren't. We'll take those and say, 'Here are the good proposals of pieces of the good proposals. Now we have something concrete to talk about.' There's a big difference between discussing a protocol in the abstract and having a protocol to look at and take good ideas from and adjust them."

Another IETF meeting near the end of July would allow those who have strong opinions on a piece of the proposal to voice their concerns and figure out the next step for the IM standard. However, the timeline for a finalized, official IM interoperability standard is still up in the air and depends on the proposals the IETF receives June 15.

Park stressed that for many companies, especially Yahoo, speeding the protocol approval process toward implementation is of the utmost priority.

Join us:
Facebook

Twitter

Pinterest

Tumblr

LinkedIn

Google+

Answers - Powered by ITworld

ITworld Answers helps you solve problems and share expertise. Ask a question or take a crack at answering the new questions below.

Join us:
Facebook

Twitter

Pinterest

Tumblr

LinkedIn

Google+

Ask a Question