The Linux Development Platform Specification 1.0 is essentially a waste of time |  Development

It is not difficult to modify the above distributions to accommodate all the variations on ncurses 4.2 and 5.0, but this is how you can expect the distributions to behave "out of the box."

LDPS does nothing to encourage distributions to take the simple steps necessary to fix the problem. LSB is simply kow-towing to existing distributions with this specification when it should be pushing distributions to become more compatible. As I have said before, LSB needs more guts than that.

As for ncurses, here is one way the problem of incompatibility could be solved effectively. Require all distributions to produce updates that install both ncurses 4.2 and 5.0, and create the symbolic links necessary to provide everyy possible library name an application may expect to find.

Then LSB should award the recognition of compliance only to those distributions willing to produce the updates. Then and only then can you use LDPS as a reliable guideline for compatibility.

Granted, developers should be able to expect people to apply updates for their applications in order for them to work. But this is no different than when an application requires service pack 4 or later in order to run on Windows NT 4.0.

Surely if Linux expects to compete with Windows NT, it can work within the same framework as Windows NT.

Join us:






Answers - Powered by ITworld

ITworld Answers helps you solve problems and share expertise. Ask a question or take a crack at answering the new questions below.

Ask a Question