Solid CRM is difficult, but not impossible

By Mario Apicella, InfoWorld |  Software Add a new comment

Managing customer relationships has always been complicated and unpredictable, but the popularity of the Internet and the explosive growth of wireless technologies make it even more so -- and more expensive. But relief is finally possible. A robust CRM (customer relationship management) solution -- from one vendor or a mix from many -- can make your sales efforts more incisive, your marketing campaigns more effective, and your customer service more efficient.

But proceed with caution: Many early adopters have reported lengthy, expensive CRM implementation cycles and failure to achieve demonstrable results. Even the boldest CTOs tremble at industry scuttlebutt which says that as many as 77 percent of CRM projects fail to some extent.

Each company requires a unique mix of resources and information to best respond to customer issues. Although technology helps, a packaged solution, no matter how well-established and rich in features it may be, will not alone take care of your customers. Even a perfectly designed solution can fail to produce results if you haven't tuned it to the specific requirements of your company.

Such requirements are often difficult to identify because different departments have different notions of what's good for the customer. To consolidate those views into a coherent image, your company may have to reassess the way it does business. Without this essential first step, your CRM implementation will have no clear target and will fail to produce significant results.

Rethinking customer relations is just the starting point. Implementing a CRM solution, which must be integrated with existing applications and infrastructure, is a monster project with a gargantuan appetite for resources. Learning from other IT leaders' experiences can help you identify the most critical parts of your CRM project and avoid common mistakes.

How tough is CRM, really?

In February, InfoWorld surveyed 500 readers who are involved with acquiring CRM software and services and who work with 100 or more other employees. The InfoWorld CRM Survey has a sample tolerance variance of plus or minus 4.4 percent at a 95 percent confidence level.

This survey offers insights into the dynamics of implementing a CRM solution. We asked our readers to share their experiences, their expectations, and their plans for CRM. To clarify our questions about CRM, an all-encompassing, confusing term, our extensive questionnaire focused on specific aspects such as sales-force, marketing, and service automation, and links to other systems including back-office and supply-chain management applications.

The InfoWorld CRM Survey revealed a telling contradiction: Although the vast majority of respondents -- 78 percent -- consider CRM critical, just 35 percent have actually implemented it. This confirms the complexity and difficulty that IT leaders face when tackling their CRM implementations. No matter how important it is for a company, the obstacles to implementing the solution are such that they can actually delay or sink the project.

The readers we interviewed pinpointed those obstacles with relentless accuracy. Not surprisingly, budget constraints are the most important barrier for the majority of the respondents. In fact, depending on the complexity and the level of integration required, implementing CRM can cost a company hundreds or thousands of dollars per seat. And that's just the beginning; respondents also warned about the costs of integrating existing applications, consulting fees, training, and potential upgrades to their hardware infrastructure.

Trying to get approval for an astronomical budget entry can be the worst possible approach. Try breaking a CRM project into more manageable and less expensive subprojects. Take a phased approach; first deploy what's most appropriate and easiest to achieve in your company's environment.

In our survey, 49 percent of readers first deployed a call center or customer service solution, 21 percent started with SFA (sales-force automation), and a significant 10 percent began by implementing MA (marketing automation).

Total buy-in or bust

One of the greatest challenges you face when implementing a CRM solution is coordinating the requirements of multiple departments. If you ask who is responsible for the customer in your company, the answer will vary depending on whom you ask. Your company's sales, marketing, accounting, and service personnel will all claim ownership, and they are all correct.

    Add a comment

    Post a comment using one of these accounts
    Or join now
    At least 6 characters

    Note: Comment will appear soon after you have activated your account.
    Obscene/spam comments will be removed and accounts suspended.
    The information you submit is subject to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

    ITworld LIVE

    SoftwareWhite Papers & Webcasts

    White Paper

    Best Practices Guide: Microsoft Exchange 2010 on VMware

    This guide provides best practice guidelines for deploying Exchange Server 2010 on vSphere.

    White Paper

    Free Trial: vRanger, the Powerful VMware Recovery Solution

    When disaster strikes, don't waste hours and dollars recovering critical data. vRanger delivers blazing-fast speed and granular recovery for your VMware applications and data. Get your free trial today.

    White Paper

    Executive Guide to Business and Software Requirements

    This paper is designed as an executive briefing on the issues surrounding business and software requirements. It features a wealth of statistics and tactics to help you get requirements right, and includes a tear-out single page summary.

    White Paper

    How to Launch a Successful IT Automation Initiative

    Corporations across all industries are under increasing pressure to cut costs and work more efficiently. In the race to meet both of these requirements, many organizations turn to technology, often purchasing and installing disparate pieces of software in hopes of achieving efficiencies not afforded by manual systems.

    White Paper

    Why Corporations Need to Automate IT Systems Management

    With corporate budgets being slashed and leaders expecting more out of their employees, companies are forced to do more with less, yet are still expected to provide the highest quality experience to customers. This is pushing them to make better use of their IT assets without breaking the budget. Companies are under more pressure than ever, thanks to data management regulations; increasingly complex security threats; and growing demand from management and end users for 24/7 uptime and high performance. These hurdles require a strategic investment in technologies that boost efficiency, save money and position IT as an integral part of the entire firm's operations. IT systems management is helping corporations fill these gaps.

    See more White Papers | Webcasts

    Ask a question

    Ask a Question