With the moratorium on Internet sales taxes ending in October, Congress is once
again trying to resolve how state sales taxes should be assessed on products bought
online.

Three pieces of legislation proposed in the U.S. Senate propose two approaches
to interstate sales via the Internet:

* A new uniform system for states to use in assessing sales tax on goods bought
through the Internet

* A ban on sales taxes except when the customer and the company are in the
same state.

Senator Byron Dorgan, D-North Dakota, has proposed a bill that would extend
the moratorium to the end of 2005 while encouraging states to agree on a uniform
manner of applying a sales tax to all goods. The three-year moratorium on taxing
interstate e-commerce was part of the 1998 Internet Tax Freedom Act.

Under Dorgan's proposed streamlined system, states would create an identical
sales tax to be applied to a product whether it was bought at a store, online,
through the mail, or over the phone.

A similar bill has been offered by Senators Ron Wyden, D-Oregon, and Patrick
Leahy, D-Vermont, although it would extend the moratorium through 2006.

Last session Senator John McCain, R-Arizona, proposed a bill to extend the
moratorium another five years; the bill was never brought to a vote. McCain,
chair of the Commerce Committee, held hearings in March on Internet taxation.

The difference between the Dorgan and Wyden-Leahy bills, according to Kent
Lassman of the conservative Citizens for a Sound Economy, is that Dorgan's bill
would enforce a streamlined tax system if states agreed upon one, while the
Wyden-Leahy proposal guarantees only that it will come up for vote in the Senate.

Frank Shafroth of the National Governors' Association says the Wyden bill is
the most likely to make it through the Senate Commerce Committee. Last year
a similar bill was passed by the House of Representatives.

Limiting Sales Taxes

Proposing a sales tax ban on all goods sold over the Internet or through the
mail, except where the retailer has a physical presence in the buyer?s state,
are Senators Judd Gregg, R-New Hampshire, and Herb Kohl, D-Wisconsin.

"If a business is located out of state, and simply ships products to consumers
there, it is not part of the local economy," Kohl says. "It should
not be subject to taxes and tax collection burdens that support a community
not its own." Shafroth says he doesn?t think the bill has "much traction."

Critics of the Gregg-Kohl approach argue that allowing Internet retailers to
avoid charging a sales tax, even if they do not have a physical presence in
a state, hurts communities that rely on the revenue generated from a state sales
tax.

With the increase in online sales, the Gregg-Kohl bill would exacerbate this
problem, says Michael Mazerov, a senior policy analyst at the Center on Budget
and Policy Priorities, a liberal think tank specializing in low-income issues.

Jerry Terry of the National Taxpayers Union , a conservative group advocating
for lower taxes, says the worries about Internet sales taking away from local
business are overstated. "Right now there doesn't appear to be a real impact,"
he says. Terry says both Internet and local retailers have benefited from the
recent economic boom.

Any advantage an Internet retailer may gain by not having to enforce a state
sales tax is negated by the shipping fees they must charge, according to Terry.

Mazerov counters that the Kohl-Gregg plan also could clear the way for consumers
to avoid paying a sales tax, no matter where a retailer is located.

Mazerov says a company like K-Mart could help customers avoid paying a sales
tax by separately incorporating its online purchasing division.

He describes how customers could go into a store, browse for what they wanted,
and then purchase the items online at a computer in the store. Because the customers
would be buying the product from a subsidiary with a warehouse in a different
state, they would avoid paying the state sales tax.

"Effectively anything purchased, as long [the customer] is willing to
wait for delivery, would be free from sales tax," Mazerov says.

Last September, California Governor Gray Davis vetoed a bill that would have
prevented California retailers that created a subsidiary to handle online orders
from avoiding a sales tax.

» posted by ITworld staff

PC World

• Email
• Print
• Share
  • Slashdot
  • Digg
  • Stumble
  • Reddit
  • Newsvine