Double opt-in done right

March 14, 2001, 02:58 PM —  Network World — 

Let's start a simple crusade that will benefit us all. The crusade is to get companies using e-mail for marketing to properly use double opt-in. We will cure them of their ignorance by embarrassing them.

Why do we need double opt-in? To deal with people who go to the Diapers ‘R' Us Web site, sign up for "Baby Diaper Offers Daily" and put in the wrong address.

Maybe they use the wrong address because the intense emotions caused by the promise of diaper data interferes with their higher brain functions, or perhaps they suffer a seizure while typing, or perhaps they are just too stupid to know their own identities.

How difficult is it to get a sequence of thirty or forty characters right when those characters represent you? Apparently from the amount of misdirected e-mail I get, much harder than one would think.

Getting someone else's address wrong is not too surprising. I regularly get e-mail for people at several companies, such as Gibbs and Associates, Gibbs Die Casting and the Katharine Gibbs School. You can see why -- their domains are gibbscam.com, gibbsdc.com and kgibbs.com.

I said getting someone else's address wrong was not too surprising, but actually when it is a vendor sending a message to a client and the vendor can't get the domain right, you have to wonder how sparky the vendor is (again, the Katharine Gibbs School seems to have rather more than its fair share of dumb vendors). But I digress. . . .

Anyway, in my experience, when someone signs up for something and gives the wrong address, many sites -- the ones that don't understand double opt-in -- do one of three things. These lame outfits either, 1) just start sending their fetid, turgid ramblings (really annoying) or, 2) send me a message saying that I have requested to receive their fetid ramblings.

At this point, if the site really wants to tick me off they can offer me an unsubscribe service that requires I send a message requesting removal from the account they sent the message to in the first place.

This is, of course, a huge pain because I get all messages sent to gibbs.com. So I either have to send the cease-and-desist message or set up yet another filter to kill their messages on receipt. I already have an ungodly number of filters under Outlook 2000, and as they don't seem to be reliable I prefer not to push my luck (have you seen the same problem?).

The third choice for these sites is to invite me to go to their Web site and deregister using the password I set up for the account. Terrific! I don't think I need to go into exactly why this is problematic. . . .

So let me explain how double opt-in works: When a user thinks he is opting-in to a mail list and enters his address on some site, the site should send a message to the address saying that if the recipient wishes to subscribe to the list, he should reply to enable the account.

The sender should then wait for perhaps as much as a couple of weeks for a reply and, if received, start the account. If no reply is received within the timeout period the site should then purge the account or the e-mail address.

Unfortunately, this methodology seems to be beyond sites such as classmates.com, which offers you a link to the unsubscribe page on its Web site that requires you to log on to modify the account, and if you forget your password you get a link to have your password mailed to you, so you have to wait for that message, then go back to the site, log on and . . . well, they just don't get it.

I'll bet you have found the same problem with many sites, so here's the plan - send me the sites that, like classmates.com, don't get it and explain what the site does wrong. I'll start compiling a list of offenders and we'll begin to hassle them. It's for their own good.

Network World

I like it!
Post a comment
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Resources
White Paper

Symantec Backup Exec 12 and Backup Exec System Recovery 8 deliver industry leading Windows data protection and system recovery. Download this whitepaper to find out the top reasons to upgrade and how to get continuous data protection and complete system recovery.

Webcast

Data and system loss — from a hard drive failure, malicious attack, natural disaster, or simple human error — can happen anytime. Don’t leave your business vulnerable. Make sure you have a secure recovery strategy in place. Symantec's latest backup and system recovery technology can efficiently restore critical applications, individual emails and documents and even restore your entire system in minutes in the event of a loss.

White Paper

Businesses face a growing challenge to ensure that the IT environment is properly protected. Backup Exec 12 integrates with other applications in the Symantec family of products, to complement your current data protection strategy, keep your data securely backed up and make it recoverable when you need it most.

Free stuff

Enterprise 2.0 Implementation
By Aaron C. Newman, Jeremy Thomas
Published by McGraw-Hill
Learn more!

Deploying Cisco Wide Area Application Services
By Zach Seils, Joel Christner
Published by Cisco Press
Learn more!

Featured Sponsor

AISO founders envisioned a Web hosting company that was environmentally friendly. While the company employed energy-efficient innovations like solar panels, its infrastructure produced unacceptable power and cooling requirements. Find out how AISO leveraged AMD technology to overcome their challenge in this case study white paper.

In this whitepaper, Scalar explores the opportunity to change the landscape with respect to mission critical databases built around Oracle. Leveraging technologies such as Linux, high-end commodity processing power and Oracle RAC technology to architect, design, build and maintain database infrastructure that delivers maximum availability, reliability and performance at a fraction of traditional cost.

On a typical day, weather.com, the Web site for The Weather Channel in Atlanta, serves up between 15 million and 20 million page views. But in September 2004, when back-to-back hurricanes ransacked Florida, the peak traffic on one day more than tripled: over 70 million page views by more than 7 million unique visitors. Read the full success story now.

More Resources