March 08, 2001, 3:34 PM — Speculating on the viability of building a new management "framework" -- or a "platform" or a broad-brush network management software set under some other name -- seemed like good theoretical fun. But the question has become more than theoretical. New vendors, small and large, are still variously in the game.
Fact is, while "frameworks" and "platforms" in the traditional sense are passe, there are a surprising number of new, platform-like entrants emerging. Some are truly new vendors, such as RiverSoft and Entuity; others are evolving from one base towards another, such as OSI/Agilent (in this case, from telecommunications towards broader data management). Micromuse is growing towards a platform-like richness, with acquisitions such as Calvin Alexander and NetOpps. Concord Communications is enhancing its portfolio in scope and focus to include real-time as well as historical analysis for networks, systems and applications. And even what many may call traditional "framework" vendors, such as Hewlett-Packard and Computer Associates, are aggressively redefining their network management models. These examples of "neo-network management platforms" are just the tip of the iceberg -- probably less than 20% of the relevant and able candidates.
You may say -- and rightly so -- that in many cases these are not "frameworks" or "platforms." Certainly, many of the vendors would decry being affiliated with either term. The products reflect two critical trends redefining the management industry: the emergence of suites (bigger than a point product, smaller than a framework), and the adoption of intelligence engines (management systems automated to perform various tasks, such as availability or performance management).
Nevertheless, many of them are or are becoming platform-like in scope. For instance, some address fault, performance, service level and inventory management -- albeit not so much as a launching pad but as an integrated suite of applications.
So, if youre about to purchase new software that seems platform-like in scope, should you prepare yourself for many days on the couch for psychoanalysis? The evidence above indicates no -- but here are a few dos and donts that might serve as basic sanity checks:
Dont get caught up in the word "framework" or the word "platform." Both are tarred with Cold War-like history -- so they carry more emotion than logic in todays marketplace. Look under the covers for a product that fits you -- regardless of name. Many vendors will seek to innovate around this in any case -- witness RiverSofts Network Management Operating System (NMOS).
Do look for interoperability, with new software that takes advantage of existing management products and adds clearly defined benefits. The future is moving towards cooperation across brands, not monolithic brand displacement.