SAN meets WAN
When Rick Nelson went to work at EchoStar/DSSH Networks in Denver in 1997, the senior IT architect had a design for a storage-area network, but unfortunately, storage vendors did not have the hardware to make that design a reality.
But the storage needs of the satellite services company continued to grow in size and complexity until a SAN became a necessity. Nelson learned that Computer Networking Technology (CNT) of Minneapolis was working with storage powerhouse EMC on a way for customers to use EMC's Symmetric Remote Data Facility (SRDF) software to replicate data over several hundred miles.
That was exactly what Nelson needed because EchoStar was building a disaster-recovery center in Gilbert, Ariz. CNT uses proprietary software to convert SRDF data frames to IP packets, which are then sent over the WAN using CNT's optical extenders.
In phase one of the SAN project, EchoStar experienced a 500% improvement in the time it took to do local tape backup. Even more importantly, EchoStar could send key company data to the disaster-recovery center, including information about EchoStar's five million customers, a data warehouse that is used for strategic analysis, Oracle Financials, and commission information about EchoStar's dealers.
Nelson says the new SAN is a vast improvement over the company's previous method of protecting its data, which consisted of "making a copy of our tapes, putting those tapes off-site and praying that nothing happens." As Nelson says, when your company's storage requirements are growing at the rate of 450% per year, and you expect to be managing 40 terabytes of storage by the end of 2001, that type of solution just won't cut it.
EchoStar is one of a growing number of companies taking advantage of new technology that can extend a SAN over long distances.
The business drivers behind this demand for longer range SANs fall into two categories: metropolitan-area networks and WANs.
First, the demand for midrange metropolitan-area networks is coming from financial institutions and large companies that want to move data out of what they consider to be dangerous areas -- areas susceptible to floods, earthquakes and other natural disasters.
For example, financial institutions and financial services companies in New York typically want to move data from Manhattan to New Jersey or neighboring states to protect it from disastrous power failures. Initially, these institutions solved the problem by shipping the data via tape to New Jersey, but when the data explosion of recent years began, this procedure became impractical, and these companies looked for another way.
They found it in the form of extended SANs -- that is, SANs that could be extended with optical networking equipment so they could cover distances of up to 120 kilometers, rather than being restrained by the 10 kilometer Fibre Channel limit.
Sign up for ITworld's Daily newsletter
Follow ITworld on Twitter @IT_world
jfruh
Apple syncing patent can't come soon enough
pasmith
New Twitter features borrow from 3rd party clients
Esther Schindler
Open Source Changes the Software Acquisition Process
mikelgan
How to set up continuous podcast play on the new iTunes
David Strom
Five important Windows 7 mobility features
sjvn
Guard your Wi-Fi for your own sake
Sandra Henry-Stocker
Grepping on Whole Words
Sidekick: The Good News & the Bad News
Either way you look at it Microsoft Data Center management did not follow standards or best practices in this failure. In which case it makes me wonder more about the outsourcing of corporate data much less personal data.
- mburton325
Join the conversation here
Quick, practical advice for IT pros. Made fresh daily.
Want to cash in on your IT savvy? Send your tip to tips@itworld.com. If we post it, we'll send you a $25 Amazon e-gift card.













