DSL providers seek level playing field

By Michael Martin, Network World |  Government

Competitive DSL providers continue to complain that one of the barriers preventing them from rolling out DSL more rapidly is a lack of cooperation on the part of incumbent local exchange carriers.

Supporting those claims is a pair of recent regulatory decisions ruling that some ILECs aren't opening local loop access to competitors as quickly as they should.

Earlier this month, the Federal Communications Commission slapped BellSouth with a $750,000 fine for failing to disclose local loop cost information to DSL provider Covad Communications. In the previous week, the U.S. Department of Justice told the FCC that Verizon, which is applying to the FCC to sell long-distance services in Massachusetts, had not given DSL competitors open access to its local loops in the state.

The difficulties competitive DSL providers are having with ILECs aren't surprising, says Adam Guglielmo, an analyst with the consultancy TeleChoice.

"This is something that's been going on since the beginning," he says.

For a competitive local exchange carrier (CLEC) or DSL provider to start service for a new customer, the ILEC, which owns the last-mile local loop, must provision the loop. CLECs and DSL providers have complained that the ILECs do not make the necessary changes to transfer a customer from the ILEC to a CLEC quickly enough.

"If you've visited any of the ILEC offices, you'd know that people at the ILECs don't feel well toward the competitive providers," Guglielmo says. "The competitors will never be a priority for them."

Ultimately, Guglielmo says, CLECs want the customer-transfer process to be automated, and software that makes the process more automatic is maturing.

In BellSouth's case, the FCC ruled that BellSouth refused to negotiate in good faith with Covad when the ILEC failed to provide Covad with local loop cost figures for six months. Competitive providers such as Covad need the loop cost data to judge whether they are being charged fair local loop leasing rates by the ILECs.

In its ruling, the FCC noted that BellSouth offered to give Covad the rates if Covad signed a nondisclosure agreement. However, because Covad would have needed to reveal the cost data to a regulatory body if a dispute between Covad and BellSouth arose, the company was right in its refusal to sign the agreement, the FCC says.

Jason Oxman, senior government affairs counsel for Covad, says his company is pleased with the FCC decision. Although the fine goes into the federal treasury, Covad got written guarantees from BellSouth that the ILEC will provide information to competitors on a timely basis.

"The most important aspect for us is the behavioral changes they've committed to making for the future," Oxman says.

Join us:
Facebook

Twitter

Pinterest

Tumblr

LinkedIn

Google+

Answers - Powered by ITworld

Join us:
Facebook

Twitter

Pinterest

Tumblr

LinkedIn

Google+

Ask a Question