Got Token Ring? It's time to give it up
Several of my clients have Token Ring problems -- both technological and political.
The technology has held up remarkably well for a long time; only now are some of these networks beginning to experience congestion problems. The political problems are just as significant; senior managers are reading industry trade publications and pressuring IT staffers to migrate away from obsolete technology. The stark reality is that IBM itself has walked away from Token Ring and has lost interest in High Speed Token Ring and Gigabit Token Ring. With Olicom gone and its networking group acquired by Intel this past year, only Madge still actively supports Token Ring. Though Madge sees a migration path toward higher speed Token Ring, a market with one major vendor is no longer a real market.
Many Token Ring networks contain thousands of nodes. There's no way that these networks can be migrated overnight without completely disrupting business. So what should you do if you find yourself in the unenviable position of having to make such a move?
If you have an ATM backbone, you're in luck. You can add switched Ethernet and run it via LAN Emulation; at the same time, you can build a Gigabit Ethernet backbone that operates in parallel until you switch over. This gives you redundancy while the Gigabit backbone is being tested, though supporting two dissimilar technologies and adding more protocols to the network is never fun.
Another option is to migrate the rings that carry the most traffic to switched Ethernet, then use routers or encapsulation schemes to permit the two protocols to coexist. A variation of this approach is to migrate by workgroup or department. This approach allows you to have your most demanding users test the new environment, but could result in significant latency for some traffic when the number of hops is increased.
Companies with multilayer switches are gradually replacing Token Ring modules by adding Ethernet and Gigabit Ethernet modules to them. This is a nice strategy, but since multilayer switches are not really popular today, we're talking about a small number of sites, generally with IBM or Alcatel switches.
Overall, migration by department or workgroup usually makes the most sense because it limits the pain, and latency issues can be addressed by geographic area of the network.
» posted by abennett
ITworld.com
Symantec Backup Exec 12 and Backup Exec System Recovery 8 deliver industry leading Windows data protection and system recovery. Download this whitepaper to find out the top reasons to upgrade and how to get continuous data protection and complete system recovery.
Data and system loss — from a hard drive failure, malicious attack, natural disaster, or simple human error — can happen anytime. Don’t leave your business vulnerable. Make sure you have a secure recovery strategy in place. Symantec's latest backup and system recovery technology can efficiently restore critical applications, individual emails and documents and even restore your entire system in minutes in the event of a loss.
Businesses face a growing challenge to ensure that the IT environment is properly protected. Backup Exec 12 integrates with other applications in the Symantec family of products, to complement your current data protection strategy, keep your data securely backed up and make it recoverable when you need it most.
