Disk error detection
Q: I sometimes see messages on the console when a disk has an error. How can I automatically look for a disk that is giving soft errors before it fails completely? Are there any tools that will do this for me?
A: Traditionally, the disk device driver reacts to a problem by printing an error via syslog that gets printed on the console and stored in the /var/adm/messages file. While this is useful, it's an inefficient way to report a problem, and it's difficult to ensure that messages aren't lost or ignored. It's also hard to parse the error messages, because you might not know all the possible error conditions that could be reported.
The SyMON 1.x and 2.x products include a log file monitor that watches the /var/adm/messages file and warns the user if it sees certain kinds of errors. A new way to monitor disks was added in Solaris 2.6, and the iostat command was extended with -e and -E options that report error counts. I've now also extended the SE toolkit to look at the same information as part of the disk monitoring rule.
This isn't normally considered a performance question, but disks that are doing multiple retries due to transient errors can cause hard-to-find performance problems -- and the performance of a dead disk is zero!
Monitoring errors with iostat
Since Solaris 2.6, a new kstat data structure has been maintained in the kernel for every disk. Here is an example output from an Ultra 2 with two disks and a CD-ROM. The disk name is given in the normal device form of sd1 unless the -n option is also used to translate the name to c0t1d0s0 form.
Sign up for ITworld's Daily newsletter
Follow ITworld on Twitter @IT_world
Esther Schindler
If the comments are ugly, the code is ugly
claird
SVG a graphics format for 21st century
pasmith
Take Chrome OS for a test spin
Sandra Henry-Stocker
Solaris Tip: Have Your Files Changed Since Installation?
jfruh
Android fragments vs. the iPhone monolith
mikelgan
What Gizmodo missed about the Pro WX Wireless USB disk drive
Where Google Chrome security fails: the password
I heard mention that the Chrome OS will have some sort of encryption available a la bitlocker. If it's possible to encrypt personal data using another password or key, then it may have potential for very secure data.... And Ubuntu has an 'encrypt home directory' option, perhaps google should follow suit.
- Dann
Join the conversation here
Quick, practical advice for IT pros. Made fresh daily.
Want to cash in on your IT savvy? Send your tip to tips@itworld.com. If we post it, we'll send you a $25 Amazon e-gift card.













