How rigid should companies be with employees' use of time?


At my office, we have two people with management oversight, and they have very different approaches. One is pretty easy-going, assigns tasks and expects them done on time. The other, and I am not exaggerating, has screamed "Shut up!" at the top of her lungs when she felt people were talking too much, has thrown things across the office, kicked a trash can across the office, and docked multiple employees' pay without telling them for checking Facebook (including the person in charge of social media). We are not talking about a factory, assembly line environment here, we are talking about people who code, writers, visual artists, basically a range of creative class individuals. I have my own feelings about which approach is more effective, but I wonder what other people think is the best approach. How much latitude should employees be allowed in how they use their time at work?

Topic: Business
Answer this Question


2 total
Vote Up (11)

I think the first question that should be asked is whether work is getting done appropriately. Are people meeting their deadlines? Is their work product of good quality? If the answer is no, then you have to address it, establish performance expectations, and hold people to them. If the answers are yes, then yelling at people, acting like a bully and stealing from them (and that is what it is when they aren't paid for their time) is the worst possible way to manage a business. THE WORST. This is especially true with jobs that require creative thought like the ones you mentioned. The danger from the company's perspective is that when you treat people poorly, you are going to build resentment and it is going to come back and bite you when you need people to go beyond a minimum effort.

It's like the movie Office Space, when the Bobs are talking to Peter Gibbons, he tells them that, " only real motivation is not to be hassled, that and the fear of losing my job. But you know, Bob, that will only make someone work just hard enough not to get fired."

Vote Up (9)

It depends on the employee. Some folks respond well to the laid back approach, they are responsible people and don't require a heavy hand. Other people are lazy or otherwise unreliable. They require a firmer hand and more oversight.

Ask a question

Join Now or Sign In to ask a question.
The Internet puts the goods, services and expertise you need at your fingertips. Some call it a 'collaborative economy' focused less on transactions and more on trades. Others see a throwback to the early days of economic exchange. Either way, it's quickly changing the way we do business.
Most unaware of, uninterested in, or hostile to mobile tracking, paying.
I've long called for HBO to make its content available to stream for people with no cable subscription. Finally we're making some progress!
Small businesses increasingly turn to Square to process payments without the hassle (and expense) of custom card-reading hardware. There are other benefits to the service, including analytics and online sales modules, as well as opportunities for larger enterprises to better serve customers.
Net income is up, yet the company says it needs to raise subscription fees.
In today's accessible technology roundup: Google wants to embed cameras in contact lenses, Apple gets a patent for a new GUI for touch devices to improve accessibility and a hacker develops a virtual cane for the blind
Streaming your games for others to watch on Twitch is a big fad these days, but it looks like the company is taking the first tentative steps towards branching into other areas.
According to a new dataset, the big names in technology lag well behind actors, politicians and athletes in terms of global cultural significance
Numbers show that paid peering arrangements result in measurable increases in service quality.
The space agency has published a catalog of its software being made available to the public, and it includes code for things other than flying a rocket to the moon
Join us: