How do you make the choice between a dedicated server or VPS for small business use?

riffin

The big push towards the cloud has created decisions for small business that did not have to be made a couple of years ago. The decision I'm looking at is the choice between a dedicated server and VPS (Virtual Private Server). If you talk to two people, with one trying to sell each, the salepeople will likely tell you whichever one they are selling is much better and the other one is a waste of money. What have people really seen to be the case in small businesses with small IT departments? Is one an obviously better choice?

Tags: server, smb, VPS
Answer this Question

Answers

2 total
jimlynch
Vote Up (18)

Hi riffin,

Here's an article that covers the VPS versus Dedicated Hosting question. I think you will find it informative as you go about making your decision.

VPS vs. Dedicated Hosting: Understand The Options
http://www.artofblog.com/vps-vs-dedicated-servers/

You might also want to check out this article:

VPS or Dedicated Server
http://www.practicalseo.org/blog/vps-or-dedicated-server/

rtrembley
Vote Up (16)

Part of the answer is dependent on how much you are concerned about cost, and your level of expertise.  VPS will probably cost less, plus you can make use of customer support in a way that you cannot with a dedicated server.  You can also choose the amount of resources you need, and pay accordingly, with the ability to scale up as growth dictates.  So if you think operating a dedicated server may be over you head in terms of time and effort, VPS might be the way to go.  On the other hand, if you have the needs, resources and abilities, a dedicated server allows you to customize your hardware as you desire to meet specific requirements.

Ask a question

Join Now or Sign In to ask a question.
Be sure to show your sysadmin how much you appreciate him or her today - but keep it sane
The first third-party servers licensed to use IBM's Power architecture will be on the market early next year.
Instead of screaming fans and meat locker temperatures, data centers are going to chill with water.
Cisco this week expanded its data center arrangement with Microsoft with a multiyear sales and go-to-market effort for integrated products. The deal builds upon one agreed to 15 months ago, when the two companies combined cloud offerings under their respective Cisco Unified Data Center and Microsoft Fast Track 3.0 architectures.
Pennsylvania has signed a seven-year deal with Unisys to consolidate the state's data centers and create an on-demand, cloud computing environment
Frustrated by a lack of renewable energy and a purchasing system that's too complicated, a dozen major US companies have joined an initiative to force the government and utilities to change.
Cisco is considering joining a handful of companies, including Google and Microsoft, that have defined a specification for 25Gbps and 50Gbps Ethernet for data centers requiring greater than 10/40Gbps.
Clean energy is no longer just the bastion of crunchy granola types and companies hoping to improve their public image.
Cisco and NetApp say FlexPod integrated IT infrastructure system generated $3 billion in joint sales in three years.
In 1964 IBM announced one of the most famous mainframes ever, the IBM System/360 which, on the low end versions ran at 0.0018 to 0.034 MIPS. For the time, that was serious performance ... in comparison, the iMac I'm writing this on runs at 92,100 MIPS.
Join us:
Facebook

Twitter

Pinterest

Tumblr

LinkedIn

Google+

randomness