What is the difference between unified and converged storage?

pwarren

I understand that converged storage grew out of the unified model, and is supposed to be superior. What is the functional difference between the two and what advantages does converged storage offer?

Answer this Question

Answers

2 total
hughye
Vote Up (19)

 

Dave Donatelli, who is (or at least was) HP's Executive Vice President and GM of Enterprise Servers, Storage and Networking sat for an interview and laid out the conceptual differences pretty succinctly:

 

"Unified storage attempted to help customers deal with the complexity and inefficiencies of storage capacity management by taking multiple architectures and putting them in a single box.

 

“That was probably a useful tool in the last decade, but this decade we have a different set of issues where figuring out how you put things into the box is not the problem,” Joyce said.” It’s how do you deal with the sheer scale of everything customers are dealing with,” including multiple applications and increasing volumes of structured and unstructured data, aka Big Data.

 

With converged storage, HP is trying to accomplish three goals, Joyce said. First, it is trying to take advantage of converged infrastructures and build storage architectures on common platforms leveraging open blade servers.

 

Second, HP is building as much commonality into its storage software components as possible, where IBRIX, LeftHand, StoreOnce and 3Par are seen as building blocks, not separate products.

 

Finally, on top of that, “we want to converge the management experience as much as possible” across the entire converged infrastructure – storage, servers and networking, Joyce said."

 http://siliconangle.com/blog/2011/06/07/converged-storage-is-in-unified-storage-is-out/

 

jimlynch
Vote Up (14)

You might want to check out this article:

Unified Vs. Converged Storage
http://www.tomsitpro.com/articles/converged-storage-bladeserver-scale-ou...

"Converged And Unified Storage: The Difference
Modern unified storage relies on a dual-controller storage architecture, and such architectures are sized according to the number of IOPS they’re expected to handle. If spare overhead is bought for future growth, then the buyer is investing a lot of extra (and currently unused) processing power. If the system is optimized for current usage levels, then scaling necessitates downtime while moving into a bigger box or coping with sprawl as more unified storage boxes are added.

In contrast, converged storage is based on three tenets: standardized platforms, federated scale-out software, and converged management. As discussed in our prior article on converged storage design, the blade architecture typically used in converged solutions allows for storage to be only one element in a compute/storage/networking stack. Because the solution is designed from the ground up with this integration and holistic management in mind, there is no cauliflower on the platter that’s been added as an afterthought. Everything is coordinated and optimized into a single unit and managed through a single UI. It not just about disks being in a common pool. All resources are in a common pool. When users need more file serving or block storage, they can simply add more resources as needed without increasing complexity or management. Unified storage hasn’t been able to follow suit."

Ask a question

Join Now or Sign In to ask a question.
U.S. data centers use more electricity than they need, a new report finds, and IT managers are too cautious about managing power and businesses are unwilling to invest in energy conservation.
With the Chinese government turning up the heat on foreign IT vendors, citing security concerns, IBM is finding help from an unlikely source: a competitor, local server vendor Inspur.
Tesla Motors and other manufacturers have set their sites on achieving lower lithium-ion battery costs through economies of scale, which should enable power storage systems for solar energy.
Fully 70% of federal agencies experienced downtime of 30 minutes or more in a recent one-month period.
Rivals dish up some fear, uncertainty, and doubt in an effort to poach IBM System x users.
The state of Wyoming is planning to discontinue most of its data center operations and move its physical equipment to commercial co-location facilities.
Oracle has given the first peek at its upcoming Sparc M7 processor, promising big performance gains for customers who use the in-memory compute features of its 12C database.
IBM is about to cut the ribbon officially opening two new state-of-the-art data centers intended to provide disaster recovery and resiliency services, one in the Raleigh, N.C. area and other in Mumbai, India.
Viewing the data center as the focal point of an ambitious set of technology initiatives, federal CIOs are working aggressively to slash server counts and consolidate facilities as they position their agencies to adopt cloud applications, roll out mobile technologies and support big data projects.
F5 Networks is a veteran player in the network management market, having sold its load balancing hardware - or application delivery controllers, as it prefers to call them - to large numbers of data center customers.
Join us:
Facebook

Twitter

Pinterest

Tumblr

LinkedIn

Google+