How can we stop the latest resurrection of CISPA?


After being pushed back last year, CISPA is back again. The head of the House Intelligence Committee, Rep. Mike Rogers (R-MI) even tweeted that pro-CISPA forces donated 15 times more money to committee members than anti-CISPA groups. I can't compete with AT&T et al to buy votes, so what can we do? I've written my Congressman, and in response got a letter thanking me for my concern about cybersecurity and a promise to take steps to ensure America is secure. Did they even read my letter?!?! So if we don't have the money to match large Fortune 100 companies, and our representatives read letters opposed to CISPA as support for it, what is left to do? Any ideas?

Topic: Government
Answer this Question


3 total
Vote Up (6)

I know it can feel like Don Quixote tilting at windmills, but basically you can do the classic things: contact your congressman and senator. As the tweet you mentioned suggests, the voice of individuals may not mean much to a lot of politicians compared to corporations with a river of cash, but it is still the best option we have. You could also donate to the Electronic Freedom Foundation, the main organization who fights this sort of thing, I suppose. Speaking of the EFF, they have a link where you can contact your congressman/senator, but I think a telephone call and/or physical letter is more effective. Still, it's better than nothing. Oh, and I also suggest you remember what they do when you are in the voting booth next election.

Vote Up (3)

Turns out all we had to do was wait for it to get to the US Senate. Unless it is something to keep them from waiting in line at the airport due to delays caused by the laws THEY passed, the odds are against a bill even being able to get an up or down vote. In this case, it worked out for the better and it looks like CISPA is not going to happen anytime soon.

Vote Up (3)

Here's a good overview of CISPA:

Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act

"The Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act (CISPA) is a proposed law in the United States which would allow for the sharing of Internet traffic information between the U.S. government and certain technology and manufacturing companies. The stated aim of the bill is to help the U.S government investigate cyber threats and ensure the security of networks against cyberattack.[1]

CISPA has been criticized by advocates of Internet privacy and civil liberties, such as the Electronic Frontier Foundation, the American Civil Liberties Union, and Those groups argue CISPA contains too few limits on how and when the government may monitor a private individual’s Internet browsing information. Additionally, they fear that such new powers could be used to spy on the general public rather than to pursue malicious hackers.[2][3]

CISPA has garnered favor from corporations and lobbying groups such as Microsoft, Facebook and the United States Chamber of Commerce, which look on it as a simple and effective means of sharing important cyber threat information with the government.[4]

Some critics saw CISPA as a second attempt at strengthening digital piracy laws after the anti-piracy Stop Online Piracy Act became deeply unpopular.[5] Intellectual property theft was initially listed in the bill as a possible cause for sharing Web traffic information with the government, though it was removed in subsequent drafts.[6]

The legislation was introduced on November 30, 2011 by U.S. Representative Michael Rogers (R-MI) and 111 co-sponsors.[7][8] It was passed in the House of Representatives on April 26, 2012, but was not passed by the U.S. Senate.[9] President Obama's advisers have argued that the bill lacks confidentiality and civil liberties safeguards and they advise the president to veto it.[10] In February 2013 the bill was reintroduced in the House.[11]"

Ask a question

Join Now or Sign In to ask a question.
The U.S. Federal Communications Commission will reserve a significant amount of spectrum in its upcoming auctions of the television band for unlicensed uses such as Wi-Fi, agency officials said Friday.
The U.S. commercial drone industry is still struggling to get off the ground more than two years after President Obama signed into law a bill that permits the civilian use of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) over the country's airspace.
Louisiana and Pennsylvania could become the latest states to impose restrictions on the use of commercial drone aircraft over their airspace.
After months of struggling to deal with undocumented immigrants, corruption and inefficiency, the Kenyan government is investing $93 million in a database that will contain all citizen information, shared across ministries.
Many U.S. residents who have written the FCC to voice concerns about the move from copper-based telephone networks to Internet Protocol are concerned about the potential effects on health from mobile-headset radiation and what happens when the electricity goes out.
The transition from copper-based telephone systems to IP networks in the U.S. could become swept up in political fallout as the FCC figures out how to regulate such networks in ways that will appease the courts.
International conflicts such as the current tensions over Ukraine could stand in the way of global cooperation on cybersecurity, according to the founder of Kaspersky Lab.
After dragging its feet for months, Apple is finally making good progress on a court-ordered antitrust compliance program related to the U.S. Department of Justice's e-book price-fixing case against the company, an external monitor said.
Chinese banks may be cutting ties to Bitcoin suppliers, but that isn't stopping a local Bitcoin exchange from making physical cash a way to buy the cryptocurrency.
The space agency has published a catalog of its software being made available to the public, and it includes code for things other than flying a rocket to the moon

White Papers & Webcasts

See more White Papers | Webcasts

Join us: