How can we stop the latest resurrection of CISPA?


After being pushed back last year, CISPA is back again. The head of the House Intelligence Committee, Rep. Mike Rogers (R-MI) even tweeted that pro-CISPA forces donated 15 times more money to committee members than anti-CISPA groups. I can't compete with AT&T et al to buy votes, so what can we do? I've written my Congressman, and in response got a letter thanking me for my concern about cybersecurity and a promise to take steps to ensure America is secure. Did they even read my letter?!?! So if we don't have the money to match large Fortune 100 companies, and our representatives read letters opposed to CISPA as support for it, what is left to do? Any ideas?

Topic: Government
Answer this Question


3 total
Vote Up (7)

I know it can feel like Don Quixote tilting at windmills, but basically you can do the classic things: contact your congressman and senator. As the tweet you mentioned suggests, the voice of individuals may not mean much to a lot of politicians compared to corporations with a river of cash, but it is still the best option we have. You could also donate to the Electronic Freedom Foundation, the main organization who fights this sort of thing, I suppose. Speaking of the EFF, they have a link where you can contact your congressman/senator, but I think a telephone call and/or physical letter is more effective. Still, it's better than nothing. Oh, and I also suggest you remember what they do when you are in the voting booth next election.

Vote Up (4)

Turns out all we had to do was wait for it to get to the US Senate. Unless it is something to keep them from waiting in line at the airport due to delays caused by the laws THEY passed, the odds are against a bill even being able to get an up or down vote. In this case, it worked out for the better and it looks like CISPA is not going to happen anytime soon.

Vote Up (4)

Here's a good overview of CISPA:

Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act

"The Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act (CISPA) is a proposed law in the United States which would allow for the sharing of Internet traffic information between the U.S. government and certain technology and manufacturing companies. The stated aim of the bill is to help the U.S government investigate cyber threats and ensure the security of networks against cyberattack.[1]

CISPA has been criticized by advocates of Internet privacy and civil liberties, such as the Electronic Frontier Foundation, the American Civil Liberties Union, and Those groups argue CISPA contains too few limits on how and when the government may monitor a private individual’s Internet browsing information. Additionally, they fear that such new powers could be used to spy on the general public rather than to pursue malicious hackers.[2][3]

CISPA has garnered favor from corporations and lobbying groups such as Microsoft, Facebook and the United States Chamber of Commerce, which look on it as a simple and effective means of sharing important cyber threat information with the government.[4]

Some critics saw CISPA as a second attempt at strengthening digital piracy laws after the anti-piracy Stop Online Piracy Act became deeply unpopular.[5] Intellectual property theft was initially listed in the bill as a possible cause for sharing Web traffic information with the government, though it was removed in subsequent drafts.[6]

The legislation was introduced on November 30, 2011 by U.S. Representative Michael Rogers (R-MI) and 111 co-sponsors.[7][8] It was passed in the House of Representatives on April 26, 2012, but was not passed by the U.S. Senate.[9] President Obama's advisers have argued that the bill lacks confidentiality and civil liberties safeguards and they advise the president to veto it.[10] In February 2013 the bill was reintroduced in the House.[11]"

Ask a question

Join Now or Sign In to ask a question.
Former U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton called for a "global compact" on surveillance and the use of collected data, saying the U.S. isn't the only country that does it and American technology companies are unfairly targeted for the government's actions.
Chinese authorities are claiming that Microsoft has yet to fully comply with the government's anti-monopoly investigation, and is demanding more information about its media player and Web browser distribution.
Two satellites that are intended to form part of the European Galileo satellite navigation system went astray from their intended orbit after launch from French Guiana on Friday, satellite launch company Arianespace said.
Widely accepted projections of a shortage of mobile spectrum may not be as dire as many analysts in the mobile and tech sectors are making it out to be, according to a new study.
A U.S. lawmaker wants to rebrand the term net neutrality because its definition is confusing to many people.
U.S government agencies will work to release cyberthreat information faster to the health-care industry after a massive breach at hospital operator Community Health Systems, representatives of two agencies said.
Path is clear for approval of H-1B spouse rule, other changes may come too. is hoping to attract more consumers from China, with a new agreement that will let the U.S. e-commerce company bring millions of products from its international sites to the country as imported goods.
China has approved the sale of 5 million Xbox One units, opening the way for Microsoft to make a big splash in the country's emerging console sector.
The U.S. Federal Communications Commission has the green light to collect new data on the pricing of so-called special access services, the middle-mile network services used to deliver business broadband and mobile service backhaul.
Join us: