What are you doing about the CIPSA vote?


There was a question here about CIPSA a week or two ago, but I haven't heard that much buzz about it. Still, I was following the story, and I both wrote and telephoned my Congressman to express my opposition. In light of his vote in favor of granting immunity to phone companies that violated the law if President Bush asked them to, I had my doubts that he would care much about individual privacy. Sure enough, I checked to see who had voted in favor, and there was "Joe Donnelly - yea" on the roll call. So I sent a copy of receipts from my previous donations to his campaigns, took a screen shot of my donation this morning to his presumptive opponent from the other party in this fall's US Senate race and demanded that I be removed from all mailing and fundraising lists.

The thing is, they didn't just pass CIPSA, they broadened it before it passed. CIPSA was amended to allow information to be shared without warrant in instances including INVESTIGATION (meaning it "could" be happening) of cybersecurity crime, protection of children (how many times do you hear "It's for the children" to justify some deploable action), and protection of individuals (what did he say about Mr. X...let's investigate!). Oh, and also anything that falls under the CFAA. Add those together and you could come up with a justification for looking at anyone's information any time you want. Remember, it doesn't have to be a valid justification, just a reason. And once they get it, they are free to share it as they see fit. Goodbye, 4th Amendment. For a detailed analysis, check on this techdirt article: http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120426/14505718671/insanity-cispa-jus...

I'm I all alone here, shouting into the wind? Are other people concerned about this happening, right after we pushed back against SOPA? Most importantly, what, if anything are people going to do about this?

Topic: Government
Answer this Question


2 total
Vote Up (10)


It sounds like you made your displeasure known.  Good for you.  Maybe if more people did, things like this wouldn't get passed.  But then again, now that the Supreme Court has determined that corporations are people and money is speech, it can be a tough battle for those of us people who are actual humans to make ourselves heard.    


I think it may take something very simple to boil it down where people are outraged enough to act.  Perhaps the provision of CIPSA that allows companies to share information with any other entity, including the federal government will do it.  The good new is that no companion bill has passed in the Senate, and President Obama has threatened to veto CIPSA if it makes it to his desk.  


Vote Up (10)

The best thing to do is to contact your legislators and express your thoughts about this. Here's an easy way to find their contact information:


"As the U.S. government's official web portal, USA.gov makes it easy for the public to get U.S. government information and services on the web.

Our Mission

We provide trusted, timely, valuable government information and services when and where you want them.

Our History

Many people and organizations have had a hand in creating our comprehensive, award-winning portal to government.

USA.gov is an interagency initiative administered by the Federal Citizen Information Center, a division of the U.S. General Services Administration's Office of Citizen Services and Innovative Technologies. It got its start when Internet entrepreneur Eric Brewer, whose early research was funded by the Department of Defense, offered to donate a powerful search engine to government. That gift helped accelerate the government's earlier work to create a government-wide portal.

In June 2000, President Clinton announced the gift from the Federal Search Foundation, a nonprofit organization established by Brewer, and instructed that an official U.S. web portal be launched within 90 days. USA.gov went online on September 22, 2000 under the name FirstGov.gov. The GSA and 22 federal agencies funded the initiative in 2001 and 2002.

USA.gov was legislatively mandated through Section 204 of the E-Government Act of 2002. Since 2002, USA.gov has received an annual appropriation from the U.S. Congress. In January 2007, FirstGov.gov officially changed its name to USA.gov. "

Ask a question

Join Now or Sign In to ask a question.
Several Facebook and WhatsApp competitors were sent questionnaires by the European Commission asking them about the effect that the US$19 billion deal between the companies could have on competition, people familiar with the matter have confirmed.
A U.S. senator has asked the Federal Trade Commission to scrutinize the use of big data by Facebook and other Internet companies, following a controversy over a Facebook experiment on some of its users.
More than 40 privacy, civil rights and religious groups have called on President Barack Obama's administration to provide a "full public accounting" of long-time email surveillance of prominent Muslims living in the U.S., following a news report detailing the spying by the U.S. National Security Agency and FBI.
U.S. National Security Agency whistleblower Edward Snowden has applied for extended asylum in Russia, according to news reports.
The U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee approved Tuesday a cybersecurity bill that would pave the way for sharing of information between government and the private sector on security threats.
A proposal by U.S. Federal Communications Commission Chairman Tom Wheeler to pump billions of dollars into Wi-Fi deployment at schools and libraries has run into a snag, with the commission's two Republican suggesting the money will come from U.S. residents' pocketbooks.
The IRS has denied one open source software company's request to become a nonprofit.
U.S. officials are open to a discussion with their German counterparts after an employee with Germany's intelligence agency was arrested for allegedly acting as a double agent for the U.S.
China's nagging pollution problems could start to abate with the help of an IBM project that seeks to predict and control the air quality in Beijing, using new computing technologies.
Don't buy, hold or sell Bitcoin or other virtual currencies until a proper regulatory regime is in place, the European Banking Authority (EBA) warned European banks on Friday.
Join us: