Why do we send our brightest foreign college grads back home?

dblacharski

College graduation is upon us once again, and thousands of foreign students are now wondering whether or not they will get a shot at the "American dream" they've heard so much about over the course of their college careers. It is the very peculiar policy of the US to invite some of the brightest young people in the world to come here and study at some of the finest universities in the world, and once they receive an excellent education, we tell them to go back home. Why should it be so difficult for a recent foreign grad to stay here and contribute to our economy? These are people who will go on to do great things, start new companies, and hire thousands of employees. The question, it seems to me is, shouldn't we have a national policy of encouraging them to stay here, so our nation's economy can enjoy the economic benefits they would create, rather than forcing them to go back home and promote that growth somewhere else?

Topic: Government
Answer this Question

Answers

2 total
RomanZ
Vote Up (12)

One could consider this a threat: sending bright college graduates back to their country of origin will help those countries’ businesses to compete with American businesses. Alternatively, this could be interpreted as the strongest form of marketing a positive message about America to those foreign nations. Rather than our State Department involving themselves overtly in the politics of competing nations, foreign nationals are changed through their experience of living, studying, and working in America. They have perhaps become accustomed to some of the benefits of living in America (a few include: relatively low prices for food and fuel, commoditization of basic goods, equality for women, wide availability of the internet, and freedom of speech). These college graduates will wish to have a similar standard of living at home. We influence the rest of the world’s choices for food, luxury goods, television shows, and popular music… the list goes on and on. Surely the participants in the “Arab Summer” have many personal reasons for standing up to their oppressive regimes, but the importance of foreign-born emissaries of American culture upon their revolts should not be understated. And by educating people from around the globe in America, we’re likely to build better relations with their nations in the future, and perhaps gain access to those markets as they mature and their populations become more affluent.

spambait
Vote Up (16)

We don't have a legal way to kidnap them and confine them to base.  And if they want to go home to start a family and a business,  we can't stop them.  And competition at home for them is much less fierce than here.  We can either make the market here less competitive (which will reduce our creativeness), or make competition in their native country more fierce.  We can send more of our own technical gurus over there to compete to increase the competitiveness in other countries (hence reduce our own resources).  Neither are good solutions.  Any suggestions ?

Ask a question

Join Now or Sign In to ask a question.
Vulnerability in software used for Department of Homeland Security background investigations allowed potential unauthorized access since 2009.
With the full Senate starting its debate on a comprehensive immigration bill, Republican lawmakers in the House have released a plan of their own, complete with a slick website.
The Apple CEO insists that his company doesn’t dodge taxes, but instructions to his personal assistant may suggest otherwise
The U.S. government should bar foreign companies that repeatedly steal or use stolen U.S. intellectual property from selling their products in the country, a new report recommended.
With the H-1B fight over and lost, Sen. Charles Grassley (R-Iowa) lashed out, almost flailing in the minutes before the Senate Judiciary Committee's final vote Tuesday.
A survey of U.S. utilities shows many are facing frequent cyberattacks that could threaten a highly interdependent power grid supplying more than 300 million people, according to a congressional report.
Apple pays a fair share of the taxes it owes the U.S. and other nations, its CEO said Tuesday, despite criticism from U.S. senators that the company is ducking taxes by shifting profits to subsidiaries that the company does not consider tax residents of any nation.
Donations to WikiLeaks since January have only been enough to cover expenditures in essential infrastructure, such as servers, according to a transparency report.
Inspired by the latest James Bond movie, U.S. Rep. John Tierney (D-Mass) is pushing a bill that would require all U.S. handgun manufacturers to include "personalization technology" in their weapons.
Amazon Web Services has finally received certification under the Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program, which the company said will lower the cost of implementing its cloud services among government organizations and agencies in the U.S.
Join us:
Facebook

Twitter

Pinterest

Tumblr

LinkedIn

Google+