Why did Apple withdraw from EPEAT?


Apple dropped its green EPEAT environmental standard, and claimed that they use their own environmental standards that are stricter than those of EPEAT. Well, that's convenient, and may even be true, but if so why not also meet the EPEAT standard? Some governmental agencies require the EPEAT green standard be met for purchases, and already the City of San Francisco has said that they won't purchase any more Apple products because of this. I'm sure that there will be others. It seems like this could be a move that costs Apple some contracts, and frankly I've always viewed Apple as a pretty environmentally conscious company, so why did they pull out of EPEAT?

Topic: Green IT
Answer this Question


3 total
Vote Up (25)

Apple released a statement to the Loop about this.

Apple responds to EPEAT concerns

"Apple on Tuesday responded to concerns that it asked to have its products removed from EPEAT, the U.S. government’s list of environmentally friendly products.

“Apple takes a comprehensive approach to measuring our environmental impact and all of our products meet the strictest energy efficiency standards backed by the US government, Energy Star 5.2,” Apple representative Kristin Huguet, told The Loop. “We also lead the industry by reporting each product’s greenhouse gas emissions on our website, and Apple products are superior in other important environmental areas not measured by EPEAT, such as removal of toxic materials.”

It’s important to note that in addition to not measuring toxins and other environmental areas, EPEAT also doesn’t measure smartphones or tablets. Clearly these are two areas that are vitally important for Apple and not covered by EPEAT.

Companies like Dell have 171 products listed on EPEAT, but yet if you look on Dell’s Web site, none of their computers are even Energy Star Compliant.

By its own admission, the EPEAT certifications are old."

Vote Up (21)

Apparently, Apple changed their mind about leaving EPEAT after getting an earful from their environmentally conscious customer base.  A notice from a senior VP of hardware engineering was posted on Apple's website today that said the company has returned to EPEAT: "We've recently heard from many loyal Apple customers who were disappointed to learn that we had removed our products from the EPEAT rating system. I recognize that this was a mistake. Starting today, all eligible Apple products are back on EPEAT." 

Vote Up (21)

Probably because part of the EPEAT standard is intended to prevent products from being essentially disposable, so there are requirements for repairability of products, and all the recent tear-downs of new Apple products have been pretty consistent with the opinion that they are not easy to repair.  Now, is it fair that even if Apple exceeds standards in other areas, it doesn't matter if they fail in the repairability category?  Maybe, maybe not.  From a practical matter, they have to weigh whether it is cost effective, or even practical, to change design and manufacturing to meet the EPEAT standard in this one category. They may lose some contracts, but if looked at from a cost/benefit perspective, is that enough of a loss to make it financially worthwhile?  It seems that Apple may think it isn't.     

Ask a question

Join Now or Sign In to ask a question.
On the positive side, with the influx of cheap solar cells, the U.S. will be able to achieve its six-gigawatt installation goal this year.
Chinese authorities have so far found no underage workers at a local Samsung Electronics supplier accused of using "child labor," but have started a campaign to crack down on the illegal activity.
Samsung Electronics has temporarily suspended business with one of its Chinese suppliers, after a labor watchdog group accused the factory of hiring five underage workers.
Frustrated by a lack of renewable energy and a purchasing system that's too complicated, a dozen major US companies have joined an initiative to force the government and utilities to change.
The solar power industry is expanding quickly, but not when it comes to funding for technology advances.
Clean energy is no longer just the bastion of crunchy granola types and companies hoping to improve their public image.
China's nagging pollution problems could start to abate with the help of an IBM project that seeks to predict and control the air quality in Beijing, using new computing technologies.
Dozens of China-based suppliers to Samsung Electronics violated various labor regulations last year, including failing to pay overtime wages and provide proper safety equipment for workers, according to recent audits.
Foxconn factories had the best working conditions in China at the time of the suicides, Gou claimed.
Expect more wearables, robots and even electric cars to come from manufacturing giant Foxconn Technology Group, as the Taiwanese company tries to reinvent itself as a broader technology service provider.