Cisco Aironet 2600 vs 3500 ?

Alexander Bautista

Which one is better? All my research says that the 2600 will deliever the same performance as the 3500 at a lower cost. The 3600 however would be a sweet deal since it will support a module to have 802.11ac in the future.

 

What are your thoughts?

Topic: Hardware
Answer this Question

Answers

3 total
Alexander Bautista
Vote Up (26)

I thought so thanks!

rousseau
Vote Up (25)

I would say that the 2600 would not deliver the same performance as the 3500 - it will deliver superior performance.  The 2600 has a max 450Mbps data rate, whereas the 3500 has a max data rate of 300Mbps.   The 2600 is a 3x4:3 access point vs. the 2x3:2 3500.  You will get a better piece of hardware with the 2600, and if you can get it for less that is just icing on the cake.

jimlynch
Vote Up (21)

If you can afford the option that future-proofs your purchase then go for it. It'll just save you from needing to upgrade at a closer point in the future. If not, go with the cheaper option as it will still meet your needs for the immediate future.

Ask a question

Join Now or Sign In to ask a question.
Big price cuts could help goose sales, which are in a slump.
Generic Android tablets with 7-inch screens and quad-core chips that deliver decent performance could soon sell for under US$35.
Hewlett-Packard reported a slight uptick in revenue for the second calendar quarter as its PC sales increased again.
Emphasis on budget: All three systems are priced well below $500.
Samsung is moving deeper into e-book and multimedia sales with Barnes & Noble, with which it jointly built a custom Nook tablet that's available now for US$179.
Scientists at Northeastern University are using nanotechnology to find an effective treatment for the Ebola virus, which has killed more than 1,200 people, and sickened even more.
Using a tablet to make a phone call may sound unorthodox. But in Asia's emerging markets, vendors are increasingly shipping 7-inch tablets with voice call functions, according to research firm IDC.
It's not surprising that former Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer abruptly gave up his board seat some six months after leaving the top job, and the move should help cement the regime and strategy of his successor Satya Nadella, according to several industry observers.
Rivals dish up some fear, uncertainty, and doubt in an effort to poach IBM System x users.
'I have become very busy' since leaving Microsoft, Ballmer says in a letter to CEO Satya Nadella
Join us:
Facebook

Twitter

Pinterest

Tumblr

LinkedIn

Google+

randomness