Could the ITU conference have an effect on internet users in the US?

rousseau

The International Telecommunications Union meeting in Dubai has some people freaking out, with commentators on both the left and right decrying the death of the open internet. Fox News even went so far as to warn that "the future of freedom in the 21st century" is at stake. How much of this doom and gloom is legitimate? How much of a difference could the outcome of the ITU conference actually make for people and companies in the US?

Topic: Internet
Answer this Question

Answers

4 total
rhames
Vote Up (17)

They resubmitted the proposal today, for whatever that's worth.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-12-12/china-russia-resubmit-proposal-...

OldHippie
Vote Up (16)

Well, first off, anything that Fox News says can usually be counted on to be an exercise in hyperbole.  There is little chance that the US would become a signatory to any treaty that reflected a move for greater governmental control as pushed by the Russians, Saudis, and Chinese.  Think about it, the Senate just rejected the treaty on disabled persons that was literally modeled on the Americans with Disabilities Act, because a significant number of people live their lives in such fear of the UN that they saw evil in the effort to treat disabled people with dignity.  These Senators and many of their constituents live in a dark fairy tail land of fear and conspiracy, and even if what comes out of ITU is the greatest treaty ever (which it won't be) there is almost no chance that those people would ratify it because, horror of horrors, it is an international treaty.  Also, the White House has said that it would reject the proposed measures, so it wouldn't even be submitted to the Senate for Ratification.   

 

Even so, the interwebs don't stop at the border.  So it could conceivably make a difference to users in the US. On the other hand, as most people know, borders don't mean a lot in how internet traffic is routed.  Even blocked URLs are pretty easy to reach though proxy servers, as people in countries with restrictive policies are well aware.  

 

New America Foundation has a solid policy brief, What's at Stake at WCIT that addresses many of the concerns.     

jimlynch
Vote Up (16)

Here's some background on the ITU.

International Telecommunication Union
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Telecommunication_Union

"The International Telecommunication Union, originally founded as the International Telegraph Union, is a specialized agency of the United Nations which is responsible for information and communication technologies. The ITU coordinates the shared global use of the radio spectrum, promotes international cooperation in assigning satellite orbits, works to improve telecommunication infrastructure in the developing world, and assists in the development and coordination of worldwide technical standards.

ITU also organizes worldwide and regional exhibitions and forums, such as ITU TELECOM WORLD, bringing together representatives of government and the telecommunications and ICT industry to exchange ideas, knowledge and technology.

The ITU is active in areas including broadband Internet, latest-generation wireless technologies, aeronautical and maritime navigation, radio astronomy, satellite-based meteorology, convergence in fixed-mobile phone, Internet access, data, voice, TV broadcasting, and next-generation networks.

ITU is based in Geneva, Switzerland, is a member of the United Nations Development Group[1] and its membership includes 193 Member States and around 700 Sector Members and Associates."

Christopher Nerney
Vote Up (12)

It appears your question may be moot...

 

"Russia, China and some other countries have withdrawn a draft proposal at the World Conference on International Telecommunications, that according to some accounts aimed to bring the Internet under the control of the International Telecommunication Union."

 

Not sure what else is on the agenda in Dubai, but that was the proposal people were up in arms about.

 

 

Ask a question

Join Now or Sign In to ask a question.
Workers who may be tempted to sell confidential corporate data should think twice about what they write in an email -- an AI-based monitoring system could be watching.
A misunderstanding by immigration officials serves as a reminder of the potential headaches of working remotely from a foreign country
Google has fired back at Microsoft with cheaper cloud services, signaling another round of price cutting in an increasingly competitive market.
Twitter is investing US$10 million in a lab at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology to build platforms for online collaboration by people on civic and political issues.
Apple TV got a software update last week that didn't exactly blow our hair back. Here are five suggestions for Apple to make the next Apple TV update a real upgrade.
The Thread Group has invited more companies to join its effort at harmonizing the "Internet of things" in consumers' homes, but it still faces a tangled industry with competing and overlapping technologies.
Facebook has apologized to drag queens and the larger LGBT community in the wake of controversy over the site's names policy, clarifying that users don't have to use their legal name.
More than 2.4 million people have signed letters calling on the U.S. Federal Communications Commission to stop its proposed "takeover" of the Internet in an effort by conservative activist group American Commitment to reframe the debate about the agency's proposed net neutrality rules.
Activists are meeting with Facebook officials Wednesday, challenging the company's real-names policy and other rules they say violate free-speech rights, sense of identity and safety.
The Internet of Things is billed as an almost magical realm of possibilities where everything from thermostats to cars will be online.

White Papers & Webcasts

See more White Papers | Webcasts

Join us:
Facebook

Twitter

Pinterest

Tumblr

LinkedIn

Google+