Can you think of a BYOD item that you would be less likely to support than a Facebook phone?

RomanZ

The first thing I though of when reading about Facebook possibly producing its own smart phone was "why." The second thing I though was, "Good luck getting IT to support that!" Other than a thumb drive with STUXNET stenciled on the side, I can't think of many devices that I would be less inclined to support. Phones are bad enough (although not THAT bad since we only support Android and iOS), and Facebook is already verboten at my office, so a combination of the two is groan inducing. I don't know much about the device itself, so maybe I'm just being negative. Would you support employees' Facebook phones?

Answer this Question

Answers

2 total
jimlynch
Vote Up (17)

No way. What a stupid idea! Who in their right mind would buy a Facebook phone anyway? Teenyboppers with too much time on their hands?

Facebook is just a web site. If it's on a phone it should be an app, or running in a browser. That's it. I cannot imagine why anybody would buy a Facebook branded phone. Ugh.

StillADotcommer
Vote Up (15)

LOL, it does have a touch of the Far Side.  I guess Facebook doesn't want to become nothing more than an app on Android and iPhones, but I don't really see the point of it.  Honestly, why would anyone want a Facebook phone when you can access Facebook using pretty much any smartphone or tablet.  Come to think of it, don't a lot of feature phones also have Facebook capabilities?  Plus, it isn't as if it is easy to design, develop and produce new hardware - look at the first Androids, they weren't exactly to die for.  Who are they going to compete against for customers?  Apple?  Good luck with that.

 

I don't know that I would be particularly wary of a Facebook branded device if it was running Android.  Sure, we block Facebook on our desktop hardware, but I don't know what additional risk it would create beyond all of the other smartphones out there.  The same BYOD security measures should work.  Now, if by some stretch they were to develop a native OS, then Facebook will be out of luck as far as I'm concerned.  We just started to support Windows Phone.  I will have to be dragged kicking and screaming down the path to supporting another OS.   

Ask a question

Join Now or Sign In to ask a question.
A new survey of IT security professionals shows that many businesses are barely starting to exploit mobile technology, and some of them may be a mobile security nightmare waiting to happen.
Think CIOs in the U.S. are struggling with how to handle BYOD? IDC's John Delaney says it's much worse in Europe.
It can be tough getting the attention of airport gate staff. Soon they might have an additional distraction: smartwatches.
Wireless broadband subscriptions now outnumber people in seven countries as consumers continue to snap up smartphones and tablets, according to a new report.
Tim Cook recently said that he performs 80% of his work on an iPad--and he thinks everyone should do the same. But is that really realistic?
At a well-known investment firm in New York City, something strange is happening: Mobile app performance issues and privacy concerns have sparked a Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) revolt, and now many employees are asking for their corporate BlackBerry back.
Apple will provide an expanded set of support services to IBM customers with iPhones and iPads under a new enterprise-grade AppleCare plan.
Corporate employees are taking a surprisingly lax approach towards security issues raised by the business use of personally owned mobile devices.
The explosive growth of public cloud services has generated a parallel problem: How can companies, especially small businesses and freelancers without the benefit of a dedicated procurement department, filter the flood of choices available for every type of business software and find the one that's best for them?
A help-wanted ad sparks talk of an Android port, but is Android big in the enterprise?
Join us:
Facebook

Twitter

Pinterest

Tumblr

LinkedIn

Google+