Is it a mistake by German publishers to force Google to pay them for being indexed by the search engine?


German magazine and newspaper publishers are suing Google for 11% of revenue made “directly or indirectly” from including their content in search results. I know that life can be hard for publishers these days, and any revenue is welcome, but this seems like it could be a case of the publishers making a strategic error. I suppose it depends on whether Google would pay the 11% or just stop indexing those publications. What do you think - a principled stand or a huge mistake by the publishers?

Topic: Legal
Answer this Question


2 total
Vote Up (2)

Probably a mistake in the short term, but I can't blame them as Google does seem to use a lot of images and other content in their results. While that drives traffic, it also makes Google a lot of money. Should they share it? I don't see how they could, but I can't blame publishers for being upset about it.

Vote Up (2)

Mistake. Germany is particularly anti-Google it seems, even among EU countries, so I’m not really surprised. I suspect the amount of traffic that Google brings to the publishers’ website is very significant, and by taking the risk that Google will stop indexing their content, they are playing with fire. What’s going to drive traffic to their sites? Word of mouth? Bing? 


But don’t just take my word for it, look what happened when Belgian publishers did the same thing. When the Court order in the publishers favor was issued, Google delisted the publishers and removed all content from Google News. It wasn’t long before the publishers were crying about Google’s “brutal” actions and asking to be relisted. I suspect the Germans will have a similar experience unless they manage to get a court to order that they both be paid for having snippets of their content in searches and that Google continue to include that content in perpetuity.

Ask a question

Join Now or Sign In to ask a question.
Oregon has filed a long-expected lawsuit against Oracle over its role developing the state's troubled health insurance exchange website, alleging the vendor fraudulently induced Oregon to pay hundreds of millions of dollars for software and services that didn't work as promised.
CIOs must think through privacy, compliance and other legal issues before unleashing armies of sensors.
A Chinese man has been indicted for allegedly directing two China-based hackers to infiltrate Boeing and other defense contractors to steal gigabytes of documents describing U.S. military aircraft.
Rimini Street has put on a brave face following a federal judge's determination that it stole Oracle's intellectual property in the course of providing software support to its customers.
An official with Liberty Reserve, a popular digital currency service that was based in Costa Rica, has pleaded guilty to money laundering and operating an unlicensed money transmitting business.
Mark Zuckerberg’s latest app takes onerous Terms of Service to a strange new level
A federal judge has dismissed a defamation claim against Oracle by third-party support vendor Rimini Street, saying Oracle was telling the truth when it accused the company of "massive theft" of its software.
The U.S. Department of Justice has asked a New York court to vacate a stay on an order that would require Microsoft to turn over to the government certain emails held abroad.
A company accused of sending unsolicited and deceptive email before the roll out of the U.S. Affordable Care Act will pay US$350,000 to settle a complaint from the U.S. Federal Trade Commission.
Autonomy's former chief financial officer has claimed that Hewlett-Packard is accusing him and other ex-employees of fraud in order to cover up its own failings in the disastrous 2011 acquisition.

White Papers & Webcasts

Webcast On Demand

Cloud BI Overview: Jaspersoft for AWS

Sponsor: TIBCO Jaspersoft

Webcast On Demand

Cloud BI in Action: Recorded Webinar of Customer, Kony, Inc.

Sponsor: TIBCO Jaspersoft

See more White Papers | Webcasts

Join us: