What will change as result of Apple's legal win over Samsung?


Will Apple winning an Austin Powers-esque One Billion Dollars in its lawsuit against Samsung have any impact on the wider smartphone/android marketplace, or were Apple's claims specific to Samsung? I know Google had a press release saying that this verdict doesn't apply to android OS, but I reckon that they would say that either way. Is this going to make a difference we will see in the marketplace, either in costs or product availability?

Topic: Legal
Answer this Question


2 total
Vote Up (13)

It remains to be seen whether the court will issue the injunction against Samsung selling many of its products in the US, as Apple has requested.  But if issued, that would only directly impact Samsung and those who desire a particular Samsung device in the near future.  


One potential long term impact for all of us could be increased innovation.  With companies on notice that patent infringement can be very costly indeed, it could make it less expensive to develop one's own ideas instead of repackaging those of others.  Perhaps that will mean capital that would otherwise be expended on reverse engineering the products of competitors will be spend on research and development.  


I doubt there will be much impact on the smartphone market in many ways.  Most of what was found to be infringing was the user interface, not the underlying OS.  Windows Phones and BlackBerries use distinctive UIs that are very different than Apple's so we know it isn't necessary to clone Apple's UI.  There will likely be changes on some of the manufacturers' UIs running on top of the vanilla UI, but to be honest, in most cases I prefer the vanilla UI anyway.

Vote Up (10)

I think companies, including Samsung, will start to be more careful when creating new products or changing existing ones. Companies will have to step back and make sure that their products aren't too close to existing ones. They'll also have to make sure that the technologies they use are either open source, paid for outright, or properly licensed.

Overall, I think it's a net positive for everyone. It will most likely force companies to engage in true innovation instead of mindless copying for a quick buck. And that's ultimately a good thing for consumers.

Ask a question

Join Now or Sign In to ask a question.
Apple will appeal a judge's order this week that denied its request for a sales ban on Samsung products that were found to infringe its patents.
Oracle has failed to persuade a federal appeals court to restore US$1.3 billion judgment in its copyright-infringement lawsuit against SAP, but will have the options of taking a lesser amount of money or pursuing a new trial.
Uber has come under fire this week for employing controversial recruitment practices against rival Lyft, but beyond a question of ethics some experts say the revelations could potentially put the company in legal hot water.
A U.S. judge has denied Apple's request for a permanent sales ban in a patent infringement lawsuit against Samsung in California.
Smartphones sold in California will soon be required to have a kill switch that lets users remotely lock them and wipe them of data in the event they are lost or stolen.
The U.S. National Security Agency built a "Google-like" search engine to give domestic and international government agencies access to details of billions of calls, texts and instant messages sent by millions of people, according to The Intercept.
Oregon has filed a long-expected lawsuit against Oracle over its role developing the state's troubled health insurance exchange website, alleging the vendor fraudulently induced Oregon to pay hundreds of millions of dollars for software and services that didn't work as promised.
CIOs must think through privacy, compliance and other legal issues before unleashing armies of sensors.
A Chinese man has been indicted for allegedly directing two China-based hackers to infiltrate Boeing and other defense contractors to steal gigabytes of documents describing U.S. military aircraft.
Rimini Street has put on a brave face following a federal judge's determination that it stole Oracle's intellectual property in the course of providing software support to its customers.
Join us: