Will you pay an additional charge to use FaceTime over 3G on the iPhone 5?


I use FaceTime pretty often over WiFi at the moment, and apparently with iOS 6 it will work over 3G.  FaceTime (any video calling really) is what I imagined the future would be when I was a kid; you whip out your communicator and have a real time face-to-face conversation with Dr. McCoy.  FaceTime on iOS 6 will expand the ability to have that conversation with Bones while you are away from WiFi, but MacRumors and other sites are reporting that AT&T is probably going to charge extra to use it, on top of what I consider an already overpriced data plan.  The way I read this is that I'll have to pay for xGB of data, and then I'll also have to pay again for extra special FaceTime data.  I don't see why I should have to pay twice.  I think it would be great to have video calling wherever I am, but I'm not convinced I should have to pay extra to use it on top of a data plan.  How reasonable is it for AT&T to force customers to pay extra in order to fully utilize the video calling features build in to the iOS 6?  

Answer this Question


2 total
Vote Up (31)

I won't.  I feel like AT&T (and most other carriers) have excessive charges already.  I'm all for a company making a reasonable profit, and recognize the need to improve infrastructure, but it seems like most of the carriers are already getting that much and more.  I don't use FaceTime very often anyway, although I did when I first got an iPhone with it.  It was neat, and still is, but 95% of the time, I just exchange text messages to communicate.  It's easier and more convenient.  Sure, there are times when it is cool to have a chat with someone over FaceTime, but it is rare enough that I am fine only doing it when I have a WiFi connection.  There is no way I am going to pay an additional fee to use it over 3G.   I'd rather do without.

Vote Up (31)

I have no interest in using Facetime over a non-wifi connection. It just doesn't interest me.

AT&T is ripping people off though if they do this. If you pay for the data, you should be able to use it for whatever you want without yet another charge. It remains to be seen if they will actually do this, but I certainly won't be paying for it.

Ask a question

Join Now or Sign In to ask a question.
Samsung Electronics has updated and rebranded its app store, in an apparent bid to cut into Google's revenue from its Play store for apps running on Android devices.
Apple users accessing Gmail on mobile devices could be at risk of having their data intercepted, a mobile security company said Thursday.
MonkeyParking, an app that lets people bid on public parking spaces, said Thursday it will suspend its service in San Francisco to avoid a potential lawsuit from the city attorney.
Amazon challenges Box with file share services, attempts to woo mobile app developers.
The U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee has voted to approve legislation that would allow mobile phone owners to unlock their devices for the purposes of switching carriers.
LinkedIn is trying again to build a service on mobile that helps keep people in touch, even when they're not actively job hunting.
You'll need an iOS or Android device to get your ears 'fitted' though.
A new study finds that most top universities are now using Python to introduce students to programming
The most successful wearable devices will be ones that can work without a phone, and AT&T will have at least one of them by the end of this year, the man who manages the carrier's partnerships said.
Google engineer releases hacking tool, Adobe issues fix; IE10, IE11 and Chrome auto-update for users.
Join us: